C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER IV—OFFICE OF LABOR-MANAGEMENT STANDARDS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER A—LABOR-MANAGEMENT STANDARDS › PART 452—GENERAL STATEMENT CONCERNING THE ELECTION PROVISIONS OF THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ACT OF 1959 › Subpart I—Election Procedures; Rights of Members

29 C.F.R. § 452.124

Delegates from units which are not labor organizations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

To the extent that units, such as committees, which do not meet the definition of a labor organization under the Act 55 participate in the election of officers of a national or international labor organization or an intermediate body, through delegates to the convention or otherwise, the provisions of title IV are, nevertheless, applicable to the election of such delegates. The following example is typical in organizations of railway employees. The chairman of a local grievance committee, which is not a labor organization under the Act, is not an officer within the meaning of the Act. If such a local chairman is a delegate to the general grievance committee, which is considered to be an intermediate body under the Act, however, he must be elected by secret ballot vote of the members he represents, if he votes for officers of the general grievance committee.

55 Act, sec. 3 (i) and (j) and part 451 of this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2016 · leading case: Murray v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 220 F. Supp. 3d 72 (D.D.C. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Murray v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 220 F. Supp. 3d 72 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 2× “” 29 C.F.R. § 452.124 ; see also id. § 451.”
Talley v. Feldman, 941 F. Supp. 501 (E.D. Pa. 1996). “Similarly, 29 C.F.R. § 452.124 expressly recognizes that the chairperson of a local committee that is not itself a labor organization may vote for officers of an intermediate labor organization, if he or she has been elected by secret ballot vote.”
Murray v. Amalgamated Transit Union (D.D.C. 2016). “” 29 C.F.R. § 452.124 (emphasis added); see also § 451.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.