29 C.F.R. § 452.93
Retired members
The right of retirees to vote may be restricted to the extent provided by the constitution and bylaws of the labor organization.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case: Charles E. Shelley v. William E. Brock, Sec'y of Labor, 793 F.2d 1368 (D.C. Cir. 1986).
Charles E. Shelley v. William E. Brock, Sec'y of Labor, 793 F.2d 1368 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “The Secretary based his conclusion that retirees were not improperly excluded from the union election on 29 C.F.R. § 452.93 , a Labor Department regulation interpreting the LMRDA.”
Alvey v. Gen. Elec. Co., 622 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1980). “The regulations also recognize the propriety of limiting participation in union affairs to those whose identification with the trade gives them a genuine interest in the matters put to a vote — under Title IV, the election of officers.”
Turner v. Local Union No. 302, 604 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir. 1979). “29 C.F.R. § 452.93 (1978). . There were further allegations based on state law, over which the district court was alleged to have pendent jurisdiction.”
United States v. Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, & Agric. Implement Workers of Am. (E.D. Mich. 2022). “1986) (“The Secretary based his conclusion that retirees were not improperly excluded from the union election on 29 C.F.R. § 452.93 , a Labor Department regulation interpreting the LMRDA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.