29 C.F.R. § 458.50

Investigations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) When he believes it necessary in order to determine whether any person has violated or is about to violate any provision of §§ 458.26 through 458.30, the Chief, DOE may cause an investigation to be conducted.

(b) When he believes it necessary in order to determine whether any person has violated or is about to violate any provision of this part (other than §§ 458.2, 458.26 through 458.30 or 458.37), a District Director may conduct an investigation.

(c) The authority to investigate possible violations of this part (other than § 458.2 or 458.37) shall not be contingent upon receipt of a complaint.

[50 FR 31312, Aug. 1, 1985. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 15117, Mar. 31, 1994; 62 FR 6094, Feb. 10, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Bernsen v. United States Dep't of Labor, 979 F. Supp. 32 (D.D.C. 1997).
Bernsen v. United States Dep't of Labor, 979 F. Supp. 32 (D.D.C. 1997). “See 29 C.F.R. § 458.50 . However, the Department determined that his complaint did “not provide an adequate basis for instituting enforcement proceedings to set aside the challenged election.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.