29 C.F.R. § 501.10

Severability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If any provision of this part is held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, or stayed pending further agency action, the provision will be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, unless such holding is one of total invalidity or unenforceability, in which event the provision will be severable from this part and will not affect the remainder thereof.

[89 FR 34068, Apr. 29, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2009 · leading case: Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 2d 696 (E.D.N.C. 2009).
Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 2d 696 (E.D.N.C. 2009). “102 (b)(14); see 29 C.F.R. § 501.10 (d) (defining an H-2A work contract), no similar provision exists under the H-2B regulations.”
Williams v. Atl. Sugar Ass'n, Inc., 773 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). “" 29 C.F.R. § 501.10 (d)(1987). It follows, therefore, *1179 that the terms set forth in an extra written work contract should be considered in determining the terms of employment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.