29 C.F.R. § 541.401
Computer manufacture and repair
The exemption for employees in computer occupations does not include employees engaged in the manufacture or repair of computer hardware and related equipment. Employees whose work is highly dependent upon, or facilitated by, the use of computers and computer software programs (e.g., engineers, drafters and others skilled in computer-aided design software), but who are not primarily engaged in computer systems analysis and programming or other similarly skilled computer-related occupations identified in § 541.400(b), are also not exempt computer professionals.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2009–2015 · leading case: Est. of Suskovich v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc., 553 F.3d 559 (7th Cir. 2009).
Est. of Suskovich v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc., 553 F.3d 559 (7th Cir. 2009). “29 C.F.R. § 541.401 (b). WellPoint also claims that Suskovich would be ineligible for overtime under the FLSA because he was a highly compensated worker who earned over $100,000 per year.”
Longlois v. Stratasys, Inc., 88 F. Supp. 3d 1058 (D. Minnesota 2015). “29 C.F.R. § 541.401 . In short, on this record, Stratasys cannot meet its burden of proving that the administrative, computer, or combination exemptions applied to Longlois in his job as an FSE.”
Campbell v. Kannapolis City Schs. Bd. of Educ., 55 F. Supp. 3d 821 (M.D.N.C. 2014). “29 C.F.R. § 541.401 . Because it is undisputed that Plaintiffs annual salary of “between 60 and $70,000” (Doc.”
Est. of Anthony J. Suskovich v. Anthem Health Plans of Virgini (7th Cir. 2009). “29 C.F.R. § 541.401 (b). WellPoint also claims that Suskovich would be ineligible for over- time under the FLSA because he was a highly com- pensated worker who earned over $100,000 per year.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.