Section 7 of the FLSA requires that covered, nonexempt employees receive not less than one and one-half times their regular rates of pay for hours worked in excess of the applicable maximum hours standards. However, section 7(o) of the Act provides an element of flexibility to State and local government employers and an element of choice to their employees or the representatives of their employees regarding compensation for statutory overtime hours. The exemption provided by this subsection authorizes a public agency which is a State, a political subdivision of a State, or an interstate governmental agency, to provide compensatory time off (with certain limitations, as provided in § 553.21) in lieu of monetary overtime compensation that would otherwise be required under section 7. Compensatory time received by an employee in lieu of cash must be at the rate of not less than one and one-half hours of compensatory time for each hour of overtime work, just as the monetary rate for overtime is calculated at the rate of not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay.
Notes of Decisions
Abendschein v. Montgomery Cnty., Md., 984 F. Supp. 356 (D. Maryland 1997).
“Gibbs, as a decision dealing with the requirements of the Civil Service Reform Act and the failure of the federal employees to specifically exclude meal period disputes from their grievance procedures. Thus, the Court does not consider Hennessey controlling on the present case.”
Bleakly v. City of Aurora, 679 F. Supp. 1008 (D. Colo. 1988).
“Applicable regulations promulgated under § 207(o) and found at 29 C.F.R. §§ 553.20 et seq. (July 1, 1987), provide in part as follows: “(a) Compensatory time and compensatory time off are interchangeable items under the FLSA.”
Murray v. City Of New York, New York (S.D.N.Y. 2020).
“” 29 C.F.R. § 553.20 . Plaintiffs Rodriguez and Scott assert that they were not awarded comp time at the applicable time-and-a-half rate required by the FLSA, and seek $1,084 in damages.”
Perry v. Hardeman Cnty. Goverment (W.D. Tenn. 2024).
“§ 207 (o)(1); 29 C.F.R. §§ 553.20 (a), 553.231(a). Defendants question whether each deputy in the proposed subclass shares all of the same theories of Defendants’ FLSA liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.