29 C.F.R. § 570.31
Secretary's determinations concerning the employment of minors 14 and 15 years of age
The employment of minors between 14 and 16 years of age in the occupations, for the periods, and under the conditions specified in § 570.34 and § 570.35, does not interfere with their schooling or with their health and well-being and shall not be deemed to be oppressive child labor.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1975–1992 · leading case: Lynn Martin, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. Funtime, Inc., a Corp., 963 F.2d 110 (6th Cir. 1992).
Lynn Martin, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. Funtime, Inc., a Corp., 963 F.2d 110 (6th Cir. 1992). “3, 29 C.F.R. §§ 570.31 -.49 (1991). The district court concluded that the appellant committed numerous violations of the above provisions, and thus the primary question on appeal is whether the district court properly ordered injunctive relief.”
McLaughlin v. McGee Bros. Co., Inc., 681 F. Supp. 1117 (W.D.N.C. 1988). “…minors in occupations not permitted and for more hours than permitted by § 3(Z) and Child Labor Regulation 3 [ 29 C.F.R. § 570.31 -.38]. (11) Since April 7,1983, Defendants have violated the oppressive child labor provisions at 29 U.S.C. §§ 212 (c) and 215(a)(4) and…”
Ray Marshall, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. Lane Processing, Inc., 606 F.2d 518 (8th Cir. 1979). “29 C.F.R. § 570.31 . While some occupations are exempt from the prohibition against the employment of “oppressive child labor,” it is clear that “processing” is not among them.”
Brennan v. Correa, 513 F.2d 161 (8th Cir. 1975). “3, 29 C.F.R. § 570.31 et seq. Again appellee promised future compliance with the Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.