29 C.F.R. § 6.20

Petition for review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Within 40 days after the date of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (or such additional time as is granted by the Administrative Review Board), any party aggrieved thereby who desires review thereof shall file a petition for review of the decision with supporting reasons. Such party shall transmit the petition in writing to the Administrative Review Board pursuant to 29 CFR part 8, with a copy thereof to the Chief Administrative Law Judge. The petition shall refer to the specific findings of fact, conclusions of law, or order at issue. A petition concerning the decision on the ineligibility list shall also state the unusual circumstances or lack thereof under the Service Contract Act, and/or the aggravated or willful violations of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act or lack thereof, as appropriate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–1994 · leading case: United States v. Hunter L. Todd A/K/A Todd Hunter D/B/A Courier Express Mail & Package Delivery Serv., 38 F.3d 277 (6th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Hunter L. Todd A/K/A Todd Hunter D/B/A Courier Express Mail & Package Delivery Serv., 38 F.3d 277 (6th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “29 C.F.R. § 6.20 . The Board’s decisions are regarded as those of the Secretary.”
Vigilantes, Inc. v. Adm'r, Wage & Hour Div., 769 F. Supp. 57 (D.P.R. 1991). “29 C.F.R. § 6.20 . Petitioners claim no impropriety in the administrative proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.