C.F.R. » Title 29 » PART 6—RULES OF PRACTICE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS ENFORCING LABOR STANDARDS IN FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY ASSISTED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND FEDERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS › Subpart C—Enforcement Proceedings Under the Davis-Bacon Act and Related Prevailing Wage Statutes, the Copeland Act, and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (Except Under Contracts Subject to the Service Contract Act)

29 C.F.R. § 6.34

Petition for review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Within 40 days after the date of the decision of the Administrative Law judge (or such additional time as is granted by the Administrative Review Board). any party aggrieved thereby who desires review thereof shall file a petition for review of the decision with supporting reasons. Such party shall transmit the petition in writing to the Administrative Review Board, pursuant to part 7 of this title, with a copy thereof to the Chief Administrative Law judge. The petition shall refer to the specific findings of fact, conclusions of law, or order at issue. A petition concerning the decision on debarment shall also state the aggravated or willful violations and/or disregard of obligations to employees and subcontractors, or lack thereof, as appropriate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: Irwin Co. v. 3525 Sage Street Assocs., Ltd., 826 F. Supp. 1067 (S.D. Tex. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Irwin Co. v. 3525 Sage Street Assocs., Ltd., 826 F. Supp. 1067 (S.D. Tex. 1992). “29 CFR § 6.34 . In its cross-motion for summary judgment, Irwin contends that the statute of limitations bars the Secretary’s claim, that the Davis-Bacon Act does not grant a private right of action to the Secretary and should be strictly construed, and, that the Davis-Bacon Act…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.