29 C.F.R. § 779.10

Interpretations made, continued, and superseded by this part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

On and after publication of this part in the Federal Register, the interpretations contained therein shall be in effect and shall remain in effect until they are modified, rescinded, or withdrawn. This part supersedes and replaces the interpretations previously published in the Federal Register and Code of Federal Regulations as part 779 of this chapter. Prior opinions, rulings and interpretations and prior enforcement policies which are not inconsistent with the interpretations in this part or with the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended by the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1961 are continued in effect; all other opinions, rulings, interpretations, and enforcement policies on the subjects discussed in the interpretations in this part are rescinded and withdrawn. The interpretations in this part provide statements of general principles applicable to the subjects discussed and illustrations of the application of these principles to situations that frequently arise. They do not and cannot refer specifically to every problem which may be met by retailers in the application of the Act. The omission to discuss a particular problem in this part or in interpretations supplementing it should not be taken to indicate the adoption of any position by the Secretary of Labor or the Administrator with respect to such problem or to constitute an administrative interpretation or practice or enforcement policy. Questions on matters not fully covered by this part may be addressed to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, or to any Regional or District Office of the Division.

Notes of Decisions
Arthur J. Goldberg, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. Harry Sorvas, Individually & Doing Bus. as Merit Prot. Serv., 294 F.2d 841 (3rd Cir. 1961). “” 29 C.F.R. § 779.10 (b) (Supp.1961.) These interpretative Rulings of the Administrator, while not of a conclusive nature are entitled to substantial weight.”
Goldberg v. Willmark Serv. Sys., Inc., 215 F. Supp. 577 (D. Minnesota 1961). “’ 29 C.F.R. § 779.10 (b) (Supp. 1961.) “These interpretative Rulings of the Administrator, while not of a conclusive nature are entitled to substantial weight.”
Goldberg v. Eagle Maint. & Supply Co., 197 F. Supp. 27 (S.D. Cal. 1961). “29 C.F.R. § 779.10 . Although in Lorenzetti v.”
Charles Goldstein v. Megerdich Dabanian & Emma K. Dabanian T/a East Tioga Check Serv.. Louis Sernovitz, Herbert Sabulsky & Sidney Singer v. Irving Hertz, T/a Terminal Check Serv., 291 F.2d 208 (3rd Cir. 1961). “See 29 C.F.R. 779.10(a), (b). It 'serves the everyday needs of the community in which it is located.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 779.10(a) — 1 case
Charles Goldstein v. Megerdich Dabanian & Emma K. Dabanian T/a East Tioga Check Serv.. Louis Sernovitz, Herbert Sabulsky & Sidney Singer v. Irving Hertz, T/a Terminal Check Serv., 291 F.2d 208 (3rd Cir. 1961). “See 29 C.F.R. 779.10(a), (b). It 'serves the everyday needs of the community in which it is located.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.