29 C.F.R. § 779.13

Production

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

To understand the meaning of “production” of goods for commerce as used in the Act it is necessary to refer to the definition in section 3(j) of the term “produced.” A detailed discussion of the application of the term as defined is contained in the interpretative bulletin on general coverage of the Act, part 776 of this chapter. Section 3(j) provides that “produced” as used in the Act “means produced, manufactured, mined, handled, or in any other manner worked on in any State; and for the purposes of this Act an employee shall be deemed to have been engaged in the production of goods if such employee was employed in producing, manufacturing, mining, handling, transporting, or in any other manner working on such goods, or in any closely related process or occupation directly essential to the production thereof, in any State.” (For the definition of “State,” see § 779.16.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1958–1958 · leading case: Schmidt v. Randall, 160 F. Supp. 228 (D. Minnesota 1958).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Schmidt v. Randall, 160 F. Supp. 228 (D. Minnesota 1958). “At 29 CFR 779.13 the Administrator states that where these bus ticket sales by a hotel are involved, “The gross receipts derived by establishment from such activities” [emphasis added] are to be used in determining the exemption.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.