29 C.F.R. § 779.318

Characteristics and examples of retail or service establishments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Typically a retail or service establishment is one which sells goods or services to the general public. It serves the everyday needs of the community in which it is located. The retail or service establishment performs a function in the business organization of the Nation which is at the very end of the stream of distribution, disposing in small quantities of the products and skills of such organization and does not take part in the manufacturing process. (See, however, the discussion of section 13(a)(4) in §§ 779.346 to 779.350.) Such an establishment sells to the general public its food and drink. It sells to such public its clothing and its furniture, its automobiles, its radios and refrigerators, its coal and its lumber, and other goods, and performs incidental services on such goods when necessary. It provides the general public its repair services and other services for the comfort and convenience of such public in the course of its daily living. Illustrative of such establishments are: Grocery stores, hardware stores, clothing stores, coal dealers, furniture stores, restaurants, hotels, watch repair establishments, barber shops, and other such local establishments.

(b) The legislative history of the section 13(a)(2) exemption for certain retail or service establishments shows that Congress also intended that the retail exemption extend in some measure beyond consumer goods and services to embrace certain products almost never purchased for family or noncommercial use. A precise line between such articles and those which can never be sold at retail cannot be drawn. But a few characteristics of items like small trucks and farm implements may offer some guidance; their use is very widespread as is that of consumer goods; they are often distributed in stores or showrooms by means not dissimilar to those used for consumer goods; and they are frequently used in commercial activities of limited scope. The list of strictly commercial items whose sale can be deemed retail is very small and a determination as to the application of the retail exemption in specific cases would depend upon the consideration of all the circumstances relevant to the situation. (Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz and Wirtz v. Steepleton General Tire Company, Inc., 383 U.S. 190, 202, rehearing denied 383 U.S. 963.)

[35 FR 5856, Apr. 9, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 14466, Aug. 6, 1971]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case: Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc., 136 F. Supp. 3d 433 (E.D.N.Y 2015).
Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc., 136 F. Supp. 3d 433 (E.D.N.Y 2015). · cites it 8× “29 C.F.R. § 779.318 (a). “The legislative history of the section 13(a)(2) exemption for certain retail or service establishments shows that Congress also intended that the retail exemption extend in some measure beyond consumer goods and services to embrace certain products…”
Johnson v. Wave Comm GR LLC, 4 F. Supp. 3d 423 (N.D.N.Y. 2014). · cites it 4× “Owopetu I, 2011 WL 883703 , at *7 (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 779.318 (a)); see also Jones, 2013 WL 6072966 , at *7 (“Tucker [Communications, Inc.”
Schwind v. EW & Assocs., Inc., 371 F. Supp. 2d 560 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). · cites it 3× “29 C.F.R. § 779.318 (a). However, 29 C.F.”
Peter J. Brennan, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. S. Prods., Inc., 513 F.2d 740 (6th Cir. 1975). · cites it 3× “2d 694 (1966); 29 C.F.R. § 779.318 . Neither did it serve the everyday needs of the community nor dispose of small quantities of goods or services at the end of the stream of distribution.”
Ramon Alvarado v. Corp. Cleaning Servs., I, 782 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2015). “” 29 C.F.R. § 779.318 . We don’t see the connection between these criteria and the reasons for excusing certain employers from the overtime provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act.”
Matrai v. DirecTV, LLC, 168 F. Supp. 3d 1347 (D. Kan. 2016). “318 which offers some definitional structure to this retail concept as “selling the services to the general public, serving the everyday needs of the community, and performing a function at the very end of the stream of distribution.”
Takacs v. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc., 444 F. Supp. 2d 1100 (S.D. Cal. 2006). “The court found that the treatment of the type of schools included on the DOL’s retail list was arbitrary, and that the DOL’s reasoning was “far from apparent from the Secretary’s characterization” of retail establishments under 29 C.F.R. § 779.318 . Thus, contrary to…”
Viciedo v. New Horizons Comput. Learning Ctr. of CoLumbus, Ltd., 246 F. Supp. 2d 886 (S.D. Ohio 2003). “29 C.F.R. § 779.318 (a). The Court finds that NHC is a retail or service establishment under this regulatory criteria.”
Liger v. New Orleans Hornets Nba Ltd. P'ship, 565 F. Supp. 2d 680 (E.D. La. 2008). · cites it 3× “However, 29 C.F.R. § 779.318 describes the characteristics and examples of retail or service establishments: Typically a retail or service establishment is one which sells goods or services to the general public.”
William E. Brock, Sec'y of Labor v. Louvers & Dampers, Inc. D/B/A Bel-Wood Country Club & Ted Stacy, 817 F.2d 1255 (6th Cir. 1987). “29 C.F.R. §§ 779.318 , 779.319. Those cases do not dispose of the issue in this case, however.”
Gatto v. Mortg. Specialists of Illinois, Inc., 442 F. Supp. 2d 529 (N.D. Ill. 2006). “29 C.F.R. § 779.318 (a). As applied to a particular employer, courts have viewed this regulation as having three components: (1) the employer sells to the general public; (2) it serves the everyday needs of the community; and (3) it is at the end of the stream of distribution…”
Alvarado v. Corp. Cleaning Serv., Inc., 719 F. Supp. 2d 935 (N.D. Ill. 2010). “” 9 29 C.F.R. § 779.318 (a). See also, Gatto, 442 F.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 779.318(a) — 1 case
La Parne v. Monex Deposit Co., 714 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (C.D. Cal. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.