29 C.F.R. § 779.372

Nonmanufacturing establishments with certain exempt employees under section 13(b)(10)

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General. A specific exemption from only the overtime pay provisions of section 7 of the Act is provided in section 13(b)(10) for certain employees of nonmanufacturing establishments engaged in the business of selling automobiles, trucks, farm implements, trailers, boats, or aircraft. Section 13(b)(10)(A) states that the provisions of section 7 shall not apply with respect to “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles, trucks, or farm implements, if he is employed by a nonmanufacturing establishment primarily engaged in the business of selling such vehicles or implements to ultimate purchasers.” Section 13(b)(10)(B) states that the provisions of section 7 shall not apply with respect to “any salesman primarily engaged in selling trailers, boats, or aircraft, if he is employed by a nonmanufacturing establishment primarily engaged in the business of selling trailers, boats, or aircraft to ultimate purchasers.” This exemption will apply irrespective of the annual dollar volume of sales of the establishment or of the enterprise of which it is a part.

(b) Character of establishment and employees exempted. (1) An establishment will qualify for this exemption if the following two tests are met:

(i) The establishment must not be engaged in manufacturing; and

(ii) The establishment must be primarily engaged in the business of selling automobiles, trucks, or farm implements to the ultimate purchaser for section 13(b)(10)(A) to apply. If these tests are met by an establishment the exemption will be available for salesmen, partsmen and mechanics, employed by the establishment, who are primarily engaged during the work week in the selling or servicing of the named items. Likewise, the establishment must be primarily engaged in the business of selling trailers, boats, or aircraft to the ultimate purchaser for the section 13(b)(10)(B) exemption to be available for salesmen employed by the establishment who are primarily engaged during the work week in selling these named items. An explanation of the term “employed by” is contained in §§ 779.307 through 779.311. The exemption is intended to apply to employment by such an establishment of the specified categories of employees even if they work in physically separate buildings or areas, or even if, though working in the principal building of the dealership, their work relates to the work of physically separate buildings or areas, so long as they are employed in a department which is functionally operated as part of the dealership.

(2) This exemption, unlike the former exemption in section 13(a)(19) of the Act prior to the 1966 amendments, is not limited to dealerships that qualify as retail or service establishments nor is it limited to establishments selling automobiles, trucks, and farm implements, but also includes dealers in trailers, boats, and aircraft.

(c) Salesman, partsman, or mechanic. (1) As used in section 13(b)(10)(A), a salesman is an employee who is employed for the purpose of and is primarily engaged in making sales or obtaining orders or contracts for sale of the automobiles, trucks, or farm implements that the establishment is primarily engaged in selling. As used in section 13(b)(10)(B), a salesman is an employee who is employed for the purpose of and is primarily engaged in making sales or obtaining orders or contracts for sale of trailers, boats, or aircraft that the establishment is primarily engaged in selling. Work performed incidental to and in conjunction with the employee's own sales or solicitations, including incidental deliveries and collections, is regarded as within the exemption.

(2) As used in section 13(b)(10)(A), a partsman is any employee employed for the purpose of and primarily engaged in requisitioning, stocking, and dispensing parts.

(3) As used in section 13(b)(10)(A), a mechanic is any employee primarily engaged in doing mechanical work (such as get ready mechanics, automotive, truck, or farm implement mechanics, used car reconditioning mechanics, and wrecker mechanics) in the servicing of an automobile, truck or farm implement for its use and operation as such. This includes mechanical work required for safe operation, as an automobile, truck, or farm implement. The term does not include employees primarily performing such nonmechanical work as washing, cleaning, painting, polishing, tire changing, installing seat covers, dispatching, lubricating, or other nonmechanical work. Wrecker mechanic means a service department mechanic who goes out on a tow or wrecking truck to perform mechanical servicing or repairing of a customer's vehicle away from the shop, or to bring the vehicle back to the shop for repair service. A tow or wrecker truck driver or helper who primarily performs nonmechanical repair work is not exempt.

(d) Primarily engaged. As used in section 13(b)(10), primarily engaged means the major part or over 50 percent of the salesman's, partsman's, or mechanic's time must be spent in selling or servicing the enumerated vehicles. As applied to the establishment, primarily engaged means that over half of the establishments annual dollar volume of sales made or business done must come from sales of the enumerated vehicles.

[35 FR 5856, Apr. 9, 1970, as amended at 38 FR 7549, Mar. 23, 1973; 76 FR 18858, Apr. 5, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 195 L. Ed. 2d 282 (2016).
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 195 L. Ed. 2d 282 (2016). · cites it 6× “5 1973) ; 29 CFR § 779.372 (c)(4) (1971). Partsmen obtain the vehicle parts needed to perform repair and maintenance and provide those parts to the mechanics.”
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 138 S. Ct. 1134 (2018). · cites it 2× “It provides that the FLSA's overtime-pay requirement does not apply to "any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles, trucks, or farm implements, if he is employed by a nonmanufacturing establishment primarily engaged in the business…”
Theadore Carl Walton, Jr. v. Greenbrier Ford, Inc., T/a Cavalier Ford, 370 F.3d 446 (4th Cir. 2004). · cites it 4× “29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (c)(4). Walton argues that under the regulation he was not a “salesman” because the regulations define that term as “an employee who is employed for the purpose of and is primarily engaged in making sales or obtaining orders or contracts for sale of the…”
Buehlman v. IDE Pontiac, Inc., 345 F. Supp. 3d 305 (W.D.N.Y. 2018). · cites it 4× “Turning to the first of these requirements, the Court previously found that the parties "agree that Plaintiff was a 'partsman' as defined in 29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (c)(2)." 3 ( Id. at 6 ).”
Thompson v. J.C. Billion, Inc., 2013 MT 20 (Mont. 2013). · cites it 4× “Thompson also argued the Department should have granted him relief by applying 29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (c)(1). The District Court concluded that this regulation impermissibly conflicted with 29 U.”
Atkins v. Old River Supply, Inc., 150 So. 3d 976 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 12× “§ 213 (b)(10)(A); 29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (d) (2013) (interpreting “primarily engaged,” as applied to the employer, to mean “that over half of the establishment[’]s annual dollar volume of sales made or business done must come from sales of the enumerated vehicles”).”
Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, 780 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir. 2015). · cites it 3× “Plaintiffs argue that we must defer to the United States Department of Labor’s 2011 regulatory definitions, set out at 29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (c). 76 Fed.Reg. 18,832-01 (Apr.”
Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. Bereuter's, Inc., 704 F.2d 1034 (8th Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “The Secretary relies on a regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (d), as a basis for rejecting Bereuter’s exemption defense.”
McBeth v. Gabrielli Truck Sales, Ltd., 768 F. Supp. 2d 383 (E.D.N.Y 2010). · cites it 2× “” 29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (c)(2). The court has little difficulty concluding that the duties performed by both McBeth at all times, and Cascone when he was a driver, bring both of these Gabrielli employees within the statutory definition of “partsmen.”
Viart v. Bull Motors, Inc., 149 F. Supp. 2d 1346 (S.D. Fla. 2001). · cites it 2× “29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (c)(3) (2000). The regulation’s inclusion of a “get-ready mechanic” within the mechanics’ exemption would seem to embrace an employee like Mr.”
Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, 845 F.3d 925 (9th Cir. 2017). “29 C.F.R. § 779.372 . The agency defined “salesman” to encompass only those salesmen who sold vehicles.”
Buehlman v. IDE Pontiac, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 3d 437 (W.D.N.Y. 2017). “§ 213 (b)(10)(A); 29 C.F.R. § 779.372 (c), If Plaintiff fell within the Exemption, he would be excluded from recovering unpaid overtime wages under either the FLSA or the NYLL.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.