C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER V—WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER B—STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY OR INTERPRETATION NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO REGULATIONS › PART 780—EXEMPTIONS APPLICABLE TO AGRICULTURE, PROCESSING OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES, AND RELATED SUBJECTS UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT › Subpart A—Introductory

29 C.F.R. § 780.5

Significance of official interpretations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The regulations in this part contain the official interpretations of the Department of Labor with respect to the application under described circumstances of the provisions of law which they discuss. These interpretations indicate the construction of the law which the Secretary of Labor and the Administrator believe to be correct and which will guide them in the performance of their duties under the Act unless and until they are otherwise directed by authoritative decisions of the courts or conclude, upon reexamination of an interpretation, that it is incorrect.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1972–2015 · leading case: Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc., 763 P.2d 173 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc., 763 P.2d 173 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “29 CFR § 780.5 to § 780.7. They contain a comprehensive definition of agriculture.”
John Barks v. Silver Bait LLC, 802 F.3d 856 (6th Cir. 2015). “2004); 29 C.F.R. § 780.5 . Thus, we consider the Department’s views only according to their power to persuade, mindful of the Department’s expertise and thorough consideration of the issue.”
James D. Hodgson v. Odus Wittenburg, 464 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1972). “See 29 C.F.R. § 780.5 (b) (1956) and 29 C.F.R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.