29 C.F.R. § 783.3

Significance of official interpretations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part contains the official interpretations of the Department of Labor pertaining to the provisions of section 6(b)(2) and the exemptions provided in sections 13(a)(14) and 13(b)(6) of the Act. It is intended that the positions stated concerning the Act will serve as “a practical guide to employers and employees as to how the office representing the public interest in its enforcement will seek to apply it” (Skidmore v. Swift, 323 U.S. 134). The Secretary of Labor and the Administrator will follow these interpretations in the performance of their duties under the Act, unless and until they are otherwise directed by authoritative decisions of the courts or conclude upon re-examination of an interpretation that it is incorrect. The interpretations contained herein may be relied upon in accordance with section 10 of the Portal-to-Portal Act (29 U.S.C. 251-262), so long as they remain effective and are not modified, amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial authority to be incorrect.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: Johnnie Mae Cole v. Farm Fresh Poultry, Inc., 824 F.2d 923 (11th Cir. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Johnnie Mae Cole v. Farm Fresh Poultry, Inc., 824 F.2d 923 (11th Cir. 1987). “The Secretary’s regulations suggest otherwise; while the introductory sections to other similar subparts of the Code of Federal Regulations expressly note that interpretations in those subparts may be relied upon to establish section 259 defenses, the introductory section to…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.