29 C.F.R. § 785.20
General
Under certain conditions an employee is considered to be working even though some of his time is spent in sleeping or in certain other activities.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: White v. Army, 118 Wash. App. 272 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003).
White v. Army, 118 Wash. App. 272 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “Finally, the workers point to 29 C.F.R. § 785.20 as supporting their argument.”
White v. Salvation Army, 75 P.3d 990 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “Finally, the workers point to 29 CFR § 785.20 as supporting their argument.”
Benjamin E. Masters, & Cross v. Maryland Mgmt. Co., & Cross, 493 F.2d 1329 (4th Cir. 1974). “See also 29 CFR § 785.20 and § 785.23. The district court determined Masters’ “regular rate” by dividing his total period of employment into four categories : sixteen short non-cabana weeks of 60 hours’ work; seventeen long non-cabana weeks of 106 hours’ work; six short cabana…”
Retrone v. Werner Enter., Inc., 121 F. Supp. 3d 860 (D. Neb. 2015). “” 29 C.F.R. § 785.20 . Where an employee is on duty for 24 hours or more, the most that can be ascribed to eating and sleeping (non-compensated time) is 8 hours.”
Nelson v. Alabama Inst. for Deaf & Blind, 896 F. Supp. 1108 (N.D. Ala. 1995). “29 C.F.R. § 785.20 (1995). An employee who is required to be on duty for less than 24 hours is working even though he is permitted to sleep or engage in other personal activities when not busy.”
Sydney A. TerMorshuizen v. Spurwink Servs., Inc., 2019 ME 77 (Me. 2019). “" 29 C.F.R. § 785.20 . The "certain conditions" may include the conditions presented in this case, i.”
United States v. Sabhnani, 566 F. Supp. 2d 139 (E.D.N.Y 2008). “In support of these findings, by the terms of 29 CFR 785.20, “[u]nder certain conditions an employee is considered to be working even though some of h[er] time is spent in sleeping or in certain other activities.”
Byrd v. ABC Prof'l Tree Serv., Inc., 832 F. Supp. 2d 917 (M.D. Tenn. 2011). “) The defendant reasons that, because the investigation arose after the company’s difficulties in finding lodging for employees working in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, those violations were “completely different factually from the claims raised by Plaintiff in…”
Bouchard v. Reg'l Governing Bd. of Region V Mental Retardation Servs., 939 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir. 1991). “29 C.F.R. §§ 785.20 -.23. *1328 Beginning in 1980, in response to inquiries from trade associations such as NAPRR, the Department issued a series of letter rulings applying its regulations to the sleep time of “houseparents” at “community residences for the mentally retarded.”
Rovetto v. Dublirer (D.N.J. 2020). “7; and Subcount II8 asserts a claim for sleep time pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 785.20 et seq. Id. ¶¶ 85-87 .”
Sydney A. TerMorshuizen v. Spurwink Servs., Inc., 2019 ME 77 (Me. 2019). “” 29 C.F.R. § 785.20 . The “certain conditions” may include the While the Wage and Hour Division’s interpretation and guidance is not binding, many courts 3 have adopted its explanations of section 785.”
Browne v. PAM Transp. Inc (W.D. Ark. 2018). “” 29 C.F.R. § 785.20 . This is so because, as the United States Supreme Court has recognized, an employer may hire an employee simply to wait for some period of time.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.