31 C.F.R. § 315.23

Evidence

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General. To establish the validity of judicial proceedings, certified copies of the final judgment, decree, or court order, and of any necessary supplementary proceedings, must be submitted. If the judgment, decree, or court order was rendered more than six months prior to the presentation of the bond, there must also be submitted a certificate from the clerk of the court, under court seal, dated within six months of the presentation of the bond, showing that the judgment, decree, or court order is in full force.

(b) Trustee in bankruptcy or receiver of an insolvent's estate. A request for payment by a trustee in bankruptcy or a receiver of an insolvent's estate must be supported by appropriate evidence of appointment and qualification. The evidence must be certified by the clerk of the court, under court seal, as being in full force on a date that is not more than six months prior to the presentation of the bond.

(c) Receiver in equity or similar court officer. A request for payment by the receiver in equity or a similar court officer, other than a receiver of an insolvent's estate, must be supported by a copy of an order that authorizes the presentation of the bond for redemption, certified by the clerk of the court, under court seal, as being in full force on a date that is not more than six months prior to the presentation of the bond.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1960–2017 · leading case: Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, 684 F.3d 382 (3rd Cir. 2012).
Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, 684 F.3d 382 (3rd Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “See 31 C.F.R. § 315.23 . The Government through its issuance of the Escheat Decision admits as much.”
Laturner v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 47 (Fed. Cl. 2017). · cites it 3× “” And 31 C.F.R. § 315.23 (a) states that “[t]o establish the validity of judicial proceedings,” a claimant must submit to Treasury “certified copies of the final judgment, decree, or court order, and of any necessary supplementary proceedings.”
Estes v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2015). · cites it 2× “as specifically provided” in Subpart E because the state court judgment satisfies the requirements that 31 C.F.R. § 315.23 (entitled “Evidence”) sets forth for establishing the validity of judicial proceedings.”
Lea v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 705 (Fed. Cl. 2017). · cites it 3× “Further, Treasury referred Massachusetts to 31 C.F.R. §§ 315.23 (a) and 353.23(a) as the sources of “the proper evidence to be submitted if this approach is followed.”
United States v. Wadlington, 333 S.W.2d 771 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “) And 31 C.F.R. 315.23(b) provides that (1) such bonds may be redeemed on one month’s notice in writing “to a Federal Reserve Bank or Branch, (2) the Bureau of Public Debt, Division of Loans and Currency, 536 South Clark Street, Chicago 5, Illinois, or (3) the Treasury…”
Treasurer State NJ v. US Dept Treas (3rd Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “31 C.F.R. § 315.23 requires “that certified copies of the final judgment, decree, or court order, and of any necessary supplementary proceedings,” be submitted to establish the validity of judicial proceedings, and also makes provisions for payment to certain bankruptcy trustees…”
— 31 C.F.R. § 315.23(a) — 1 case
Lea v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 705 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “Further, Treasury referred Massachusetts to 31 C.F.R. §§ 315.23 (a) and 353.23(a) as the sources of “the proper evidence to be submitted if this approach is followed.”
— 31 C.F.R. § 315.23(b) — 1 case
United States v. Wadlington, 333 S.W.2d 771 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “) And 31 C.F.R. 315.23(b) provides that (1) such bonds may be redeemed on one month’s notice in writing “to a Federal Reserve Bank or Branch, (2) the Bureau of Public Debt, Division of Loans and Currency, 536 South Clark Street, Chicago 5, Illinois, or (3) the Treasury…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.