31 C.F.R. § 35.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part implements sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act, as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act (Subtitle M of Title IX of Pub. L. 117-2) and amended by section 102 of Division LL of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Pub. L. 117-328).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: State of Arizona v. Janet Yellen, 34 F.4th 841 (9th Cir. 2022).
State of Arizona v. Janet Yellen, 34 F.4th 841 (9th Cir. 2022). “26,786 (May 17, 2021) (codified at 31 C.F.R. § 35.1 et seq.). Specifically, the IFR provides that a State will be considered to have used [ARPA funds] to offset a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from changes in law, regulation, or interpretation if, and to the extent…”
State of Missouri v. Janet Yellen, 39 F.4th 1063 (8th Cir. 2022). “27, 2022) ( 31 C.F.R. § 35.1 et seq.). The Final Rule states that Treasury will consider a recipient to have impermissibly used ARPA funds to offset a reduction in net tax revenue if it fails to offset that reduction through means unrelated to the ARPA funds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.