31 C.F.R. § 560.201
Prohibited importation of goods or services from Iran
Except as otherwise authorized pursuant to this part, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to May 7, 1995, the importation into the United States of any goods or services of Iranian origin or owned or controlled by the Government of Iran, other than information and informational materials within the meaning of section 203(b)(3) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(3)), is prohibited.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1993–2013 · leading case: United States v. Zia Hassanzadeh, 271 F.3d 574 (4th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Zia Hassanzadeh, 271 F.3d 574 (4th Cir. 2001). “Order 12,613, 31 C.F.R. § 560.201 (1987). 1 On March 13, 2000, customs officials notified Hassanzadeh’s company that some of the carpets were not marked with a country of origin and that the shipment could not be released until all the carpets were marked.”
Weinstein v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 299 F. Supp. 2d 63 (E.D.N.Y 2004). “See 31 C.F.R. §§ 560.201 ; 560.204. On March 15, 1995, President Clinton issued EO 12957, declaring a national emergency regarding actions and policies of Iran and imposing additional sanctions against Iran, invoking the authority of, inter alia, the IEEPA.”
United States v. Banki, 685 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2011). “See 31 C.F.R. §§ 560.201 -.209 (“Prohibitions”); see also 31 C.”
UNITED STATES of Am., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Massoud NOUSHFAR; Zohreh Shayesteh & Kamran Shayesteh, Defendants-Appellants, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir. 1996). “29, 1987), 31 C.F.R. §§ 560.201 , 560.403. The embargo prevented importation of Iranian products, but did not prevent ownership.”
United States v. 863 Iranian Carpets, 981 F. Supp. 746 (N.D.N.Y. 1997). “§ 1595a(c)(2)(B), of 863 Iranian carpets allegedly imported illegally in violation of 31 C.F.R. § 560.201 . On October 15, 1997, the Court held a bench trial on Plaintiffs claim of forfeiture.”
Khamooshpour v. Holder, 781 F. Supp. 2d 888 (D. Ariz. 2011). “§§ 1701 ,1702,1704,1705(b), and 31 C.F.R. 560.201, 560.204, and 560.206; and 2) failure to report foreign financial accounts, 31 U.”
United States v. Shahrokh Ahangaran, 998 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1993). “504 , which allows upon proper documentation the licensing of Iranian origin goods which were outside Iran prior to the effective date of the executive order. Shah-rokh argues that the district court should have allowed him to question Inspector Toth regarding the licensing…”
United States v. Modanlo, 954 F. Supp. 2d 384 (D. Maryland 2013). “The Court is once again, although this time for different reasons, called to pass upon Nader Modanlo’s contention that the Government is collaterally es-topped from criminally prosecuting him for (1) conspiring to violate and ultimately violating the United States trade embargo…”
United States v. Shabahang Persian Carpets, Ltd., 926 F. Supp. 123 (E.D. Wis. 1996). “The plaintiff maintains that Shabahang imported and introduced more than twenty-two carpets of Iranian origin into the United States through the alleged smuggling scheme between April 1, 1989, and June 24, 1989, in violation of 31 C.F.R. §§ 560.201 et seq. The plaintiff asserts…”
United States v. Banki, 660 F.3d 665 (2d Cir. 2011). “See 31 C.F.R. §§ 560.201 -.209 (“Prohibitions”); see also 31 C.”
United States v. Hassanzadeh (4th Cir. 2001). “Order 12,613, 31 C.F.R. § 560.201 (1987).1 On March 13, 2000, customs officials notified Hassanzadeh’s com- pany that some of the carpets were not marked with a country of ori- gin and that the shipment could not be released until all the carpets were marked.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.