31 C.F.R. § 596.201

Prohibited financial transactions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as authorized by regulations, orders, directives, rulings, instructions, licenses, or otherwise, no United States person, on or after the effective date, knowing or having reasonable cause to know that a country is designated under section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2405, as a country supporting international terrorism, shall engage in a financial transaction with the government of that country.

Note to § 596.201: The name of each country that has been designated under section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2405, as a country supporting international terrorism is published in the Federal Register by the Department of State, and a complete list of countries currently so designated can be found via the Web site of the Department of State at http://www.state.gov/j/ct/.

[80 FR 34054, June 15, 2015]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36 cases, 2000–2018 · leading case: Belkin v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 667 F. Supp. 2d 8 (D.D.C. 2009).
Belkin v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 667 F. Supp. 2d 8 (D.D.C. 2009). · cites it 2× “1 (d) (2008); 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2009); Determination Pursuant to Section 6(1) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 — Iran, 49 Fed.”
Rothstein v. UBS AG, 708 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2013). “” 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (a). (See generally FAC ¶ 100.”
Price v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 294 F.3d 82 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “See 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2001); Rein v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 162 F.”
Daliberti v. Repub. of Iraq, 97 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.D.C. 2000). · cites it 3× “(codified at 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 ). No rescission of this designation has been published pursuant to statute, and Iraq remains so designated.”
Price v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 384 F. Supp. 2d 120 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 2× “See 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2001); Price v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 294 F.”
Elahi v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 124 F. Supp. 2d 97 (D.D.C. 2000). · cites it 2× “1541 ; 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (prohibiting exports and sales to Iran).”
Est. of Heiser v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 466 F. Supp. 2d 229 (D.D.C. 2006). “See 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2001); Flatow, 999 F.”
Acosta v. the Islamic Repub. of Iran, 574 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2008). “As to the first requirement, defendant Iran has been designated a state sponsor of terrorism continuously since January 19, 1984, and was so designated at the time of the attack.”
Blais v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 459 F. Supp. 2d 40 (D.D.C. 2006). “See 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2001); Flatow, 999 F.”
Ben-Rafael v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 540 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2008). “1 (d) (2005); 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2005)). The second requirement is inapplicable because the bombing did not occur in Iran.”
Bodoff v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 424 F. Supp. 2d 74 (D.D.C. 2006). “See 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2001). As to defendant Khamenei, the applicable FSIA section is the Flatow Amendment, which provides that an official, employee, or agent of a foreign state designated as a state sponsor of terrorism, while acting within the scope of his or her office,…”
Haim v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 425 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2006). “See 31 C.F.R. § 596.201 (2001); Flatow, 999 F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.