31 C.F.R. § 900.8

No private rights created

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The standards in this chapter do not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any other person, nor shall the failure of an agency to comply with any of the provisions of parts 900-904 of this chapter be available to any debtor as a defense.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2022 · leading case: Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation v. United States
Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation v. United States (2009) uscfc · cites it 2× “2 (citing 31 C.F.R. § 900.8 ("The standards in this chapter do not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any other person, nor shall the failure of an agency to…”
Joan Laskowski and Daniel M. Cook v. Margaret Spellings, Secretary of Education, and University of Notre Dame, Interveno (2006) ca7 “See 31 C.F.R. § 900.8 . The majority thus holds, and I agree, that the taxpayers’ claim for injunctive relief is indeed moot.”
NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2021) ohsd · cites it 7× “Finally, DOT relies on 31 C.F.R. § 900.8 , which sets forth standards for DOT and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) for collecting debts.”
Jordan v. United States (2022) uscfc · cites it 2× “13 31 C.F.R. § 900.8 ; see also Confederated Tribes & Bands of The Yakama Nation v.”
Laskowski, Joan v. Spellings, Margaret (2006) ca7 “See 31 C.F.R. § 900.8 . The majority thus holds, and I agree, that the taxpayers’ claim for injunctive relief is indeed moot.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.