32 C.F.R. § 1642.2
The claim for classification in Class 3-A
A claim for classification in Class 3-A must be made by the registrant in writing. Prior to the consideration of the claim, the registrant shall submit supporting documentation, such documents being placed in his file folder.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1955–1973 · leading case: David Seymour Graves v. United States, 252 F.2d 878 (9th Cir. 1958).
David Seymour Graves v. United States, 252 F.2d 878 (9th Cir. 1958). ““32 C.F.R., § 1642.2: Continuing duty. When it becomes the duty of a registrant or other person to perform an act * *, the duty or obligation shall be a continuing duty or obligation from day to day * s *»”
David Leroy Daniels v. United States, 372 F.2d 407 (9th Cir. 1967). “2 Daniels then presented his position in a personal appearance before the Board, as provided for in 32 CFR § 1642.2 . The Board, however, declined to reopen the case, and again classified him I-O.”
United States v. Robert I. Toussie, 410 F.2d 1156 (2d Cir. 1969). “7 (c), which states: The duty of every person subject to registration to present himself for and submit to registration shall continue at all times, and if for any reason any such person is not registered on the day or one of the days fixed for his registration, he shall…”
William Thomas Fisher v. United States, 413 F.2d 1034 (9th Cir. 1969). “32 C.F.R. § 1642.2 (1968) provides: “Continuing duty.”
Dan Lee White v. United States, 403 F.2d 1005 (8th Cir. 1969). “” 32 C.F.R. § 1642.2 . “Regardless of the time when or the circumstances under which a registrant fails or has failed to report for induction pursuant to an Order to Report for Induction * * * it shall thereafter be his continuing duty from day to day to report for induction * *…”
United States v. Clyde William Brunner, 457 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir. 1972). “Finally, Brunner was under a continuing duty to report under 32 C. F.R. §§ 1642.2 and 1642.15. That continuing duty is explicitly extended to registrants in custody.”
Leon Silverman v. United States, 220 F.2d 36 (8th Cir. 1955). “…act or the supplying of incorrect or false information shall in no way operate as a waiver of that continuing duty.” 32 C.F.R. § 1642.2 .”
United States v. Case, 344 F. Supp. 169 (W.D. Mo. 1972). “1968); 32 CFR § 1642.2 . His refusal to submit to induction on May 25, 1971, did not in any way operate to effect the validity of the Induction Order issued February 22, 1971, nor did the Local Board terminate or suspend the Induction Order at that time.”
Dunn, 14 I. & N. Dec. 160 (BIA 1972). “ctive Service regulations implementing section 12 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, supra, provide in substance that it is a continuing duty of all "registrants" to report for and submit to induction "regardless of the time when or the circumstances under which…”
United States v. Barry Allen Bruckman, 466 F.2d 754 (7th Cir. 1972). “On appeal the court found no error in the district court’s instruction to the jury that — although the indictment charged failure to report June 6, 1951 —the offense was a continuing one under 32 C.”
Meyers v. Local Bd. 8, Providence, 323 F. Supp. 1243 (S.D.N.Y. 1971). “32 CFR § 1642.2 (d). It seems clear that Victor was given the required “opportunity to appear in person” but declined to avail himself of it.”
United States v. James Robert Harstad, 487 F.2d 565 (9th Cir. 1973). “32 C.F.R. § 1642.2 (1971) reads, “When it becomes the duty of a registrant .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.