34 C.F.R. § 100.1
Purpose
The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) to the end that no person in the United States shall; on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2022 · leading case: Capella Univ., Inc. v. Exec. Risk Specialty Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 1040 (8th Cir. 2010).
Capella Univ., Inc. v. Exec. Risk Specialty Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 1040 (8th Cir. 2010). “§ 3413 ; 34 C.F.R. § 100.1 . The OCR receives and investigates complaints from aggrieved individuals.”
Cain v. Esthetique, 182 F. Supp. 3d 54 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “34 C.F.R. §§ 100.1 , 104.1 (describing purpose of relevant regulations); see also Ryan v.”
Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. Detroit Pub. Schs., 160 F. Supp. 2d 767 (E.D. Mich. 2001). “1 : [n]o person in the United States shall; on the ground of race, color or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the…”
Washington Legal Found. v. Lamar Alexander, Sec'y of Educ., 984 F.2d 483 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “See 34 C.F.R. §§ 100.1 -.13 (1992). The regulations do not address so-called “minority scholarships” as such, but some guidance is found in the present policy on affirmative action: (i) In administering a program regarding which the recipient has previously discriminated against…”
Henkle v. Gregory, 150 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (D. Nev. 2001). “See 34 C.F.R. § 100.1 et seq. In addition to this administrative scheme, the Supreme Court in 1979 held that Title IX was enforceable by an individual through an implied right of action.”
Pearl River Union Free Sch. Dist. v. King, 214 F. Supp. 3d 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “1 , are meant to effectuate the purposes of Title VI, “[t]he responsible Department official or his designee will make a prompt investigation,” which “should include, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, the circumstances under…”
Bd. of Educ., Yonkers City Sch. Dist. v. CNA Ins., 647 F. Supp. 1495 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “34 C.F.R. § 100.1 , et seq. (1985). The underlying lawsuit cannot be regarded fairly as a breach of contract claim.”
White v. Engler, 188 F. Supp. 2d 730 (E.D. Mich. 2001). “§ 2000d and 34 C.F.R. §§ 100.1 et seq., the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and 42 U.”
Albra v. Bd. of Trs. of Miami Dade Coll., 296 F. Supp. 3d 181 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “See 34 C.F.R. § 100.1 . To that end, "[a]ny person who believes himself .”
Meyers Ex Rel. Meyers v. Bd. of Educ., 905 F. Supp. 1544 (D. Utah 1995). “§ 2000d, and its implementing regulations, 34 C.F.R. §§ 100.1 et seq., which prohibit racial discrimination in the operation of federally funded programs, as well as the injunction and consent decree in Sinajini.”
Pennsylvania Ass'n for Child. & Adults with Learning Disabilities v. Commonwealth, 498 A.2d 16 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1985). “See 34 C.F.R. §§100.1 and 100.6. Petitioners in the instant case are involved in activities to ensure that learning disabled and other handicapped children in Pennsylvania receive ap *535 propriate educational services.”
Alexander v. Underhill, 416 F. Supp. 2d 999 (D. Nev. 2006). “Title Vi’s administrative scheme allows persons who believe they were discriminated against to file a written complaint with the responsible department official. 34 C.F.R. § 100.7 (b).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.