34 C.F.R. § 104.31
Application of this subpart
Subpart D applies to preschool, elementary, secondary, and adult education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance and to recipients that operate, or that receive Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1987–2018 · leading case: Mr. P v. W. Hartford Bd. of Educ., 885 F.3d 735 (2d Cir. 2018).
Mr. P v. W. Hartford Bd. of Educ., 885 F.3d 735 (2d Cir. 2018). “§ 794 ; 34 C.F.R. §§ 104.31 - 104.39. The meeting minutes reflect that M.”
Urban Ex Rel. Urban v. Jefferson Cnty. Sch. Dist. R-1, 89 F.3d 720 (10th Cir. 1996). “, 34 C.F.R. § 104.31 et seq., we conclude that if a disabled child is not entitled to a neighborhood placement under the IDEA, he is not entitled to such a placement under section 504.”
Schwarz v. Villages Charter Sch., Inc., 165 F. Supp. 3d 1153 (M.D. Fla. 2016). “” 34 C.F.R. § 104.31 ; 7 C.F.R. § 15b.20. The DOE’s Subpart F contains provisions relating to “Health, Welfare, and Social Services”, while the DOA’s Subpart F contains provisions relating to “Other Aid, Benefits, or Services.”
Sullivan Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Vallejo City Unified Sch. Dist., 731 F. Supp. 947 (E.D. Cal. 1990). “See 34 C.F.R. §§ 104.31 , et seq.; see also Timms v.”
Michelle K. v. Pentucket Reg'l Sch. Dist., 79 F. Supp. 3d 361 (D. Mass. 2015). “evaluation, placement, IEP, provision of special education in accordance with state and federal law, or procedural protections of state and federal law for students with disabilities” and a parent or student may also “request a hearing on any issue involving the denial of the…”
J.T. v. Dumont Pub. Schs., 103 A.3d 269 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2014). “See 34 C.F.R. §§ 104.31 to -39. Indeed, the IDEA and the RA are "built around fundamental notions of equal access to state programs and facilities" and thus "their substantive requirements .”
Hudson Ex Rel. Hudson v. Bloomfield Hills Pub. Schs., 910 F. Supp. 1291 (E.D. Mich. 1995). “§ 794 , and the attendant implementing regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 104.31 et seq. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap by agencies receiving federal funds.”
S-1 v. Spangler, 832 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1987). “The parents then petitioned the North Carolina State Board of Education (State Board) to rule either that the hearing officer had authority to hear their claim or, alternatively, to amend the state regulations enacted pursuant to the EHA to confer such authority on him. The…”
S-1 ex rel. P-1 v. State Bd. of Educ., 6 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 1993). “The parents then petitioned the North Carolina State Board of Education (State Board) to rule either that the hearing officer had authority to hear their claim or, alternatively, to amend the State regulations enacted pursuant to the EHA to confer such authority on him. The…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.