34 C.F.R. § 106.1
Purpose
The purpose of this part is to effectuate Title IX, which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in this part. This part is also intended to effectuate section 844 of the Education Amendments of 1974, Public Law 93-380, 88 Stat. 484.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
North Haven Board of Education v. Bell (1982)
“" 34 CFR § 106.1 (1980) (emphasis added). [28] HEW's comments accompanying publication of its final Title IX regulations confirm our view that Subpart E is consistent with the Act's program-specificity.”
Jane Doe v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center (2017)
“See 34 C.F.R. § 106.1 ; 45 C.F.R. § 86.1 ; Title IX Common Rule, supra, at 52,865 (all saying Title IX applies to “any” education program or activity “whether or not” it’s “offered or sponsored by an educational institution”); U.”
University of Richmond v. Bell (1982)
“See 34 C.F.R. § 106.1 et seq. (1981). At issue is whether the ED is authorized to investigate and regulate the athletic program of a private university where the athletic program itself receives no direct federal financial assistance.”
Canutillo Independent School District v. Martha Leija and Jerry Leija as Next Friends of Rosemarie Leija, a Minor (1997)
“Gwinnett County Public Schools, as implemented by 34 CFR § 106.1 et seq., and as interpreted by the OCR’s draft Guid-ances on Harassment of Students by School Employees, 61 Fed.”
Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of Columbia (1994)
“The regulations also define a “recipient” as [A]ny State or political subdivision thereof, or any instrumentality of a State or political subdivision thereof, any public or private agency, institution, or organization, or other entity, or any person, to whom Federal financial…”
Bennett v. West Texas State University (1981)
“(hereinafter Title IX) and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 34 C.F.R. § 106.1 et seq. (originally codified at 45 C.”
Hillsdale College v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1982)
“” 34 C.F.R. § 106.1 (1981). The portions of the regulations at issue in this case deal with the definitions of “recipient” and “federal financial assistance.”
Jane Doe v. Univ. of Ky. (2019)
“See 34 C.F.R. § 106.1 ; 45 C.F.R. § 86.1 ; Title IX Common Rule, supra , at 52,865 (all saying Title IX applies to "any" education program or activity "whether or not" it's "offered or sponsored by an educational institution"); U.”
Mennone v. Gordon (1995)
“The regulations go on to define a “recipient” as: any State or political subdivision thereof, or any instrumentality of a State or political subdivision thereof, any public or private agency, institution, or organization, or other entity, or any person, to whom Federal financial…”
Mehus v. Emporia State University (2004)
“when it denied her certain benefits of employment or discriminated against her by (1) paying her lower salary and benefits than similarly situated male employees; (2) awarding her smaller and less frequent increases in salary and benefits than similarly situated male employees;…”
Alston v. Virginia High School League, Inc. (1999)
“See 34 C.F.R. § 106.1 -.71 (1998). The regulations define the term “recipient” as: [A]ny State or political subdivision thereof, or any instrumentality of a StatS or political subdivision thereof, any public or private agency, institution, or organization, or other entity, or…”
Hall v. St. Mary's Seminary & University (2009)
“61; 34 C.F.R. §§ 106.1 -.71. When an individual initiates a complaint and seeks further investigation by OCR, the agency must determine within 105 days of receiving the complaint whether a violation has occurred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.