C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 106—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN EDUCATION PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES RECEIVING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE › Subpart B—Coverage

34 C.F.R. § 106.11

Application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in this subpart, this part applies to every recipient and to all sex discrimination occurring under a recipient's education program or activity in the United States. For purposes of this section, conduct that occurs under a recipient's education program or activity includes but is not limited to conduct that occurs in a building owned or controlled by a student organization that is officially recognized by a postsecondary institution, and conduct that is subject to the recipient's disciplinary authority. A recipient has an obligation to address a sex-based hostile environment under its education program or activity, even when some conduct alleged to be contributing to the hostile environment occurred outside the recipient's education program or activity or outside the United States.

[89 FR 33886, Apr. 29, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: Grove City Coll. v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555 (1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Grove City Coll. v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555 (1984). · cites it 6× “" 34 CFR § 106.11 (1983) (emphasis added). These regulations, like those at issue in North Haven Board of Education v.”
Haffer v. Temple Univ. of Com. Sys., Etc., 524 F. Supp. 531 (E.D. Pa. 1981). · cites it 2× “” 34 C.F.R. § 106.11 (1980). 4 Temple seeks summary judgment.”
Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist., 604 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (S.D. Cal. 2009). “See 34 C.F.R. § 106.11 . Defendants do not dispute that Title DC is applicable here.”
Victim Rights Law Ctr. v. DeVos (D. Mass. 2021). “See 34 C.F.R. § 106.11 (“[T]his part 106 applies to every recipient and to the education program or activity operated by such recipient which receives Federal financial assistance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.