C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart B—State Eligibility

34 C.F.R. § 300.122

Evaluation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Children with disabilities must be evaluated in accordance with §§ 300.300 through 300.311 of subpart D of this part.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(7))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1984–2003 · leading case: T.S. v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 54, 265 F.3d 1090 (10th Cir. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
T.S. v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 54, 265 F.3d 1090 (10th Cir. 2001). · cites it 5× “” 34 C.F.R. § 300.122 (a)(3)© (West 2001). Thus, if T.”
Tunstall v. Bergeson, 5 P.3d 691 (Wash. 2000). “§ 1412 (a)(1)(B) be provided to children with disabilities who, prior to their incarceration in an adult prison, (a) were not actually identified as being a child with a disability under § 1401(3) or (b) did not have an individualized education program under §§ 1411-1420, 34…”
Warton v. New Fairfield Bd. of Educ., 217 F. Supp. 2d 261 (D. Conn. 2002). · cites it 2× “Similarly, Section 10-76d-l(a)(7) of the Connecticut Agencies Regulations provides that a student who has not received a regular high school diploma continues to be eligible for special education and related services until the end of the school year in which the student turns…”
Tunstall Ex Rel. Tunstall v. Bergeson, 5 P.3d 691 (Wash. 2000). “34 C.F.R. § 300.122 (citing 20 U.S.C. § 1412 (a)(1)(B)).”
St. Johnsbury Academy v. D.H., 240 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2001). “300 (a), (b) (emphasis added); see also 34 C.F.R. § 300.122 (a)(1) (“The obligation to make FAPE available to all children with disabilities does not apply with respect to .”
Town of Burlington v. Dep't of Educ., 736 F.2d 773 (1st Cir. 1984). “For states that contract for inclusion, the Act expressly authorizes and requires a state and local administrative apparatus to effectuate both its substantive and procedural guarantees in the first instance.”
Barnett v. Memphis City Schs., 50 F. App'x 219 (6th Cir. 2002). “34 C.F.R. § 300.122 (a)(3)(ii). The district court did not address the question of whether the case is moot for other reasons.”
Barnett v. Memphis City Sch. Sys., 294 F. Supp. 2d 924 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). “34 C.F.R. § 300.122 (a)(3)(ii). 2 . In holding that Russman was not an appropriate application of the “capable of repetition, but evading review” exception, the Court noted that Colleen left her school district on her own accord and not as a result of the school district’s…”
— 34 C.F.R. § 300.122(a)(3) — 1 case
Warton v. New Fairfield Bd. of Educ., 217 F. Supp. 2d 261 (D. Conn. 2002). “Similarly, Section 10-76d-l(a)(7) of the Connecticut Agencies Regulations provides that a student who has not received a regular high school diploma continues to be eligible for special education and related services until the end of the school year in which the student turns…”
— 34 C.F.R. § 300.122(a)(3)(ii) — 1 case
Warton v. New Fairfield Bd. of Educ., 217 F. Supp. 2d 261 (D. Conn. 2002). “Similarly, Section 10-76d-l(a)(7) of the Connecticut Agencies Regulations provides that a student who has not received a regular high school diploma continues to be eligible for special education and related services until the end of the school year in which the student turns…”
— 34 C.F.R. § 300.122(a)(3)(iii) — 1 case
T.S. v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 54, 265 F.3d 1090 (10th Cir. 2001). “” 34 C.F.R. § 300.122 (a)(3)© (West 2001). Thus, if T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.