34 C.F.R. § 300.20
Include
Include means that the items named are not all of the possible items that are covered, whether like or unlike the ones named.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2001–2008 · leading case: Patrick Navin v. Park Ridge Sch. Dist. 64, Fred Schroeder, & Sally Pryor, 270 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2001).
Patrick Navin v. Park Ridge Sch. Dist. 64, Fred Schroeder, & Sally Pryor, 270 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2001). “Although the idea grants rights to “parents,” and the regulatory definition of “parent” includes all biological parents, see 34 C.F.R. § 300.20 , which implies that a divorced parent retains statutory rights, nothing in the idea overrides states’ allocation of authority as part…”
Fuentes v. Bd. of Educ. of City of New York, 540 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2008). “34 C.F.R. § 300.20 (a) (1999). We reasoned that 20 U.”
Taylor v. Vermont Dep't of Educ., 313 F.3d 768 (2d Cir. 2002). “” 34 C.F.R. § 300.20 (b)(1). The regulation therefore allows a foster parent to exercise parental rights under the IDEA when both parents have lost rights over educational decision-making, even if this has been accomplished by something less than an irrevocable termination of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.