C.F.R.
»
Title 34
» CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart D—Evaluations, Eligibility Determinations, Individualized Education Programs, and Educational Placements
(a) General. A State must adopt, consistent with § 300.309, criteria for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability as defined in § 300.8(c)(10). In addition, the criteria adopted by the State—
(1) Must not require the use of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, as defined in § 300.8(c)(10);
(2) Must permit the use of a process based on the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention; and
(3) May permit the use of other alternative research-based procedures for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, as defined in § 300.8(c)(10).
(b) Consistency with State criteria. A public agency must use the State criteria adopted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section in determining whether a child has a specific learning disability.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 1401(30); 1414(b)(6))
Notes of Decisions
Michael P. v. Department of Education (2011)
ca9 · cites it 16×
“14, 2006) (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. § 300.307 ). The amended regulations provide that an evaluation team may find a child eligible for special education under the "specific learning disability" classification if the child demonstrates (1) inadequate *1062 achievement relative…”
Diaz-Fonseca v. Commonwealth of PR (2006)
ca1
“See 34 C.F.R. § 300.307 (a) (“Physi *21 cal education services, specially designed if necessary, must be made available to every child with a disability receiving FAPE.”
Dr. P. Schellbach v. Colonial IU 20 (2017)
pacommwct · cites it 2×
“To support her disagreement with the eligibility criteria used by the District, Appellant observes that under 34 CFR §300.307 , state criteria “must not require the use of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and 8 achievement for determining whether a child has a…”
Reynolds v. George County School District (2022)
mssd
“at 1556 (citing 34 C.F.R. § 300.307 (c) (“[The Act] contemplates that the determination whether special education is necessary will be determined by the [plan].”
P.F. v. OCEAN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION (2022)
njd
“2; see also 34 C.F.R. § 300.307 (a). Applying the severe discrepancy approach, I find that the District, as it was required to do, considered a variety of assessments in addition to the results of the UTAH Estimator, when making its Eligibility Determination.”
— 34 C.F.R. § 300.307(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.