34 C.F.R. § 300.608

State enforcement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If an SEA determines that an LEA is not meeting the requirements of Part B of the Act, including the targets in the State's performance plan, the SEA must prohibit the LEA from reducing the LEA's maintenance of effort under § 300.203 for any fiscal year.

(b) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to restrict a State from utilizing any other authority available to it to monitor and enforce the requirements of Part B of the Act.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1416(f); 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(11))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2011 · leading case: Thomas v. Dist. of Columbia, 773 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2011).
Thomas v. Dist. of Columbia, 773 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2011). · cites it 2× “See 34 C.F.R. 300.608; id. § 300.200. An SEA is responsible for general supervision and enforcement, see D.”
Thomas v. Dist. of Columbia (D.D.C. 2011). · cites it 2× “See 34 C.F.R. 300.608; id. § 300.200. An SEA is responsible for general supervision and enforcement, see D.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.