34 C.F.R. § 303.448

Civil action

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General. Any party aggrieved by the findings and decision made under §§ 303.440 through 303.445 who does not have the right to an appeal under § 303.446(b), and any party aggrieved by the findings and decision under § 303.446(b), has the right to bring a civil action with respect to the due process complaint under § 303.440. The action may be brought in any State court of competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States without regard to the amount in controversy.

(b) Time limitation. The party bringing the action has 90 days from the date of the decision of the hearing officer or, if applicable, the decision of the State review official, to file a civil action, or, if the State has an explicit time limitation for bringing civil actions under part C of the Act, in the time allowed by that State law.

(c) Additional requirements. In any action brought under paragraph (a) of this section, the court—

(1) Receives the records of the administrative proceedings;

(2) Hears additional evidence at the request of a party; and

(3) Basing its decision on the preponderance of the evidence, grants the relief that the court determines to be appropriate.

(d) Jurisdiction of district courts. The district courts of the United States have jurisdiction of actions brought under section 615 of the Act without regard to the amount in controversy.

(e) Rule of construction. Nothing in this part restricts or limits the rights, procedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or other Federal laws protecting the rights of children with disabilities, except that before the filing of a civil action under these laws seeking relief that is also available under section 615 of the Act, the procedures under §§ 303.440 and 303.446 must be exhausted to the same extent as would be required had the action been brought under section 615 of the Act.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(i)(2), 1415(i)(3)(A), 1415(l), 1439)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2022 · leading case: W.R. v. State of Ohio Health Department
W.R. v. State of Ohio Health Department (2016) ca6 · cites it 6× “) Defendants moved to dismiss for Plaintiffs’ failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 34 C.F.R. § 303.448 and Ohio Admin. Code § 3701-8-10(F)(3), failure to state a claim under Fed.”
Loper v. Help Me Grow of Cuyahoga County (2018) ohioctapp · cites it 2× “440 to 34 C.F.R. 303.448[.] {¶32} Ohio Adm.Code 3701-8-10(F)(3) clearly prescribes an administrative remedy for claims arising out of Part C of the IDEA against the DODD and related state and county agencies.”
Lemus v. Shaffner (2022) dcd “34 C.F.R. § 303.448 (b). DCI filed its complaint on January 25, 2021, the last day of the limitations period, so the statute of limitations applicable to DCI’s appeal has ran out.”
— 34 C.F.R. § 303.448(e) — 1 case
Loper v. Help Me Grow of Cuyahoga County (2018) ohioctapp “440 to 34 C.F.R. 303.448[.] {¶32} Ohio Adm.Code 3701-8-10(F)(3) clearly prescribes an administrative remedy for claims arising out of Part C of the IDEA against the DODD and related state and county agencies.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.