34 C.F.R. § 361.1
Purpose
Under the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program, the Secretary provides grants to assist States in operating statewide comprehensive, coordinated, effective, efficient, and accountable vocational rehabilitation programs, each of which is—
(a) An integral part of a statewide workforce development system; and
(b) Designed to assess, plan, develop, and provide vocational rehabilitation services for individuals with disabilities, consistent with their unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice so that they may prepare for and engage in competitive integrated employment and achieve economic self-sufficiency.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Williams v. Dep't of Human Servs. Div. of Rehab. Servs., 2019 IL App (1st) 181517.
Williams v. Dep't of Human Servs. Div. of Rehab. Servs., 2019 IL App (1st) 181517. “34 C.F.R. § 361.1 (2016) (stating purpose of the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program); see also 29 U.”
Hedgepeth v. North Carolina Div. of Servs. for the Blind, 543 S.E.2d 169 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 701 (b)(1); 34 C.F.R. § 361.1 (1997). States, such as North Carolina, choosing to accept federal grants as provided for by the Act, must comply with the Act’s guidelines and regulations.”
Buchanan v. Ives, 793 F. Supp. 361 (D. Me. 1991). “” 34 C.F.R. § 361.1 (1991) (emphasis added).”
Indiana Dep't of Human Servs. v. Firth, 590 N.E.2d 154 (Ind. Ct. App. 1992). “” 34 C.F.R. § 361.1 (1991). Neither the statute nor the regulations defines “capacities and abilities,” however.”
Mindy Reaves v. Missouri Dep't of Elementary & Secondary Educ. Missouri Div. of Vocational Rehab. D. Kent King, 422 F.3d 675 (2d Cir. 2005). “” 34 C.F.R. § 361.1 . To be eligible for these grants, States must submit plans that comply with 29 U.”
Comm'r, Dep't of Human Resources v. Haggard, 327 S.E.2d 798 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985). “[(now 34 CFR § 361.1 et seq.)].” Appellee *677 did not contest the agency’s finding of fact that he had no “substantial handicap to employment.”
Millay v. State of Maine Dep't of, 762 F.3d 152 (1st Cir. 2014). “See 34 C.F.R. § 361.1 ; Reaves v. Mo. Dep’t of Elem.”
Pa. Dept. of Lab. & I. v. Pa. Hum. Rel. Com., 545 A.2d 412 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988). “See 34 C.F.R. §361.1 (1987). Regulation 361.42(a) enumerates the broad spectrum of vocational rehabilitation services which are available through OVR as follows: (a) Scope of services.”
United States v. State of New York, 700 F. Supp. 2d 186 (N.D.N.Y. 2010). “1 (describing “state supported employment services program” as a program to assist States’ provision of "programs of supported employment services for individuals with the most severe disabilities”); 34 C.F.R. § 361.1 (noting that State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program…”
Baumeister v. New Mexico Comm'n for the Blind, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1250 (D.N.M. 2006). “2005) (quoting 34 C.F.R. § 361.1 ). Section 102(c), codified at 29 U.”
Stevenson v. Com., Dept. of Labor & Ind., 648 A.2d 344 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994). “he Federal Act define “employability” as follows: Employability means a determination that, with the provision of vocational rehabilitation services, the individual is likely to enter or retain, as a primary objective, full-time employment, or if appropriate, part-time…”
Krull v. Jones, 46 F. Supp. 2d 997 (D.S.D. 1999). “, the regulations set forth in 34 C.F.R. 361.1 et seq., and the official manual of policies and practices of the Division.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.