C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 361—STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES PROGRAM › Subpart B—State Plan and Other Requirements for Vocational Rehabilitation Services

34 C.F.R. § 361.31

Cooperative agreements with private nonprofit organizations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must describe the manner in which cooperative agreements with private nonprofit vocational rehabilitation service providers will be established.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1205-0522) (Authority: Section 101(a)(24)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(24)(B))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1988–1998 · leading case: Buchanan v. Ives, 793 F. Supp. 361 (D. Me. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Buchanan v. Ives, 793 F. Supp. 361 (D. Me. 1991). “34 C.F.R. § 361.31 , 29 U.S.C. § 722 (d).”
Doe v. Pfrommer, 148 F.3d 73 (2d Cir. 1998). “10(k) in failing to provide plaintiff with “status quo” benefits during the pendency of his administrative appeal; and (3) the defendants violated 34 C.F.R. § 361.31 and 8 N.Y.C.R.R. § 247.”
Pa. Dept. of Lab. & I. v. Pa. Hum. Rel. Com., 545 A.2d 412 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988). “34 C.F.R. §361.31 (1987). In addition, as OVR points out in its brief, individuals who disagree with the state board's eligibility determinations, for any reason, have a remedy in the fair hearing procedures mandated under federal law by 29 U.”
Chirico v. Off. of Vocational & Educ. Servs. for Individuals with Disabilities, 211 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “Petitioner first argues that he has not reached his full vocational potential and the voice-activated computer system would remove a substantial obstacle to advancement, thereby maximizing his "employability” (34 CFR 361.31 [b] [2]; 8 NYCRR 247.5 [c] [2]; see, 29 USC 706 [8] [A]…”
Commonwealth v. Commonwealth, 545 A.2d 412 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988). “34 C.F.R. §361.31 (1987). In addition, as OVR points out in its brief, individuals who disagree with the state boards eligibility determinations, for any reason, have a remedy in the fair hearing procedures mandated under federal law by 29 U.”
Vito v. R.I. Dept. of Human Servs., 92-3034 (1992) (Sup. Ct. R.I. 1992). “15 020 021 at 003 (1992); see 34 C.F.R. 361.31(b) (1992). Finding that the plaintiff suffered from loss of hearing, that hearing was essential to acting as a "counselor," and that the plaintiff possessed a long work history, the VR Agency accepted the plaintiff for services on…”
Bell v. Off. of Vocational Rehab., 667 A.2d 503 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “” 34 C.F.R. § 361.31 (b). 5 The state must assure that there is a preliminary diagnostic study to determine an individual’s eligibility.”
— 34 C.F.R. § 361.31(b) — 1 case
Vito v. R.I. Dept. of Human Servs., 92-3034 (1992) (Sup. Ct. R.I. 1992). “15 020 021 at 003 (1992); see 34 C.F.R. 361.31(b) (1992). Finding that the plaintiff suffered from loss of hearing, that hearing was essential to acting as a "counselor," and that the plaintiff possessed a long work history, the VR Agency accepted the plaintiff for services on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.