34 C.F.R. § 361.35

Innovation and expansion activities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the State will reserve and use a portion of the funds allotted to the State under section 110 of the Act—

(1) For the development and implementation of innovative approaches to expand and improve the provision of vocational rehabilitation services to individuals with disabilities, particularly individuals with the most significant disabilities, including transition services for students and youth with disabilities and pre-employment transition services for students with disabilities, consistent with the findings of the comprehensive statewide assessment of the rehabilitation needs of individuals with disabilities under § 361.29(a) and the State's goals and priorities under § 361.29(c);

(2) To support the funding of the State Rehabilitation Council, if the State has a Council, consistent with the resource plan identified in § 361.17(i); and

(3) To support the funding of the Statewide Independent Living Council, consistent with the Statewide Independent Living Council resource plan prepared under Section 705(e)(1) of the Act.

(b) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must—

(1) Describe how the reserved funds will be used; and

(2) Include a report describing how the reserved funds were used.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1205-0522) (Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(18) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a) (18))

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1998 · leading case: Pa. Dept. of Lab. & I. v. Pa. Hum. Rel. Com., 545 A.2d 412 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Pa. Dept. of Lab. & I. v. Pa. Hum. Rel. Com., 545 A.2d 412 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988). “34 (1987), Extended evaluation to determine vocational rehabilitation potential; 34 C.F.R. §361.35 (1987), Certification. Eligibility; extended evaluation to determine vocational rehabilitation potential; ineligibility.”

Feliciano Lopez v. Departamento de la Familia, 4 T.C.A. 101 (1998). “34 C.F.R. § 361.35 . Esta reglamentación no está vigente actualmente.”

Bell v. Off. of Vocational Rehab., 667 A.2d 503 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995). “34 C.F.R. § 361.35 . In the case at bar, our review of the record reveals that substantial evidence supports the OVR’s finding that an appropriate evaluation site was available but that Bell refused to cooperate with the OVR.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.