34 C.F.R. § 395.36
Enforcement procedures
(a) The State licensing agency shall attempt to resolve day-to-day problems pertaining to the operation of the vending facility in an informal manner with the participation of the blind vendor and the on-site official responsible for the property of the property managing department, agency, or instrumentality as necessary.
(b) Unresolved disagreements concerning the terms of the permit, the Act, or the regulations in this part and any other unresolved matters shall be reported in writing to the State licensing agency supervisory personnel by the Regional or other appropriate official of the Federal property managing department, agency, or instrumentality in an attempt to resolve the issue.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1983–1998 · leading case: Southfork Sys., Inc. v. The United States, & State of Texas, Acting Through the Texas Comm'n for the Blind, 141 F.3d 1124 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
Southfork Sys., Inc. v. The United States, & State of Texas, Acting Through the Texas Comm'n for the Blind, 141 F.3d 1124 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “” 34 C.F.R. § 395.36 (a). Regulations promulgated by the Department of Defense (DOD) to implement the RSA give preference to SLA proposals in order that “[t]he blind will be given a priority in award of contracts to operate cafeterias.”
Marlar v. State, 666 P.2d 504 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). “Regulations promulgated to implement the provisions of the Randolph-Sheppard Act provide that the “State licensing agency shall attempt to resolve day-to-day problems pertaining to the operation of the vending facility in an informal manner with the participation of the blind…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.