34 C.F.R. § 76.653

Needs, number of students, and types of services

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A subgrantee shall determine the following matters on a basis comparable to that used by the subgrantee in providing for participation of public school students:

(a) The needs of students enrolled in private schools.

(b) The number of those students who will participate in a project.

(c) The benefits that the subgrantee will provide under the program to those students.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1996–1997 · leading case: Cefalu ex rel. Cefalu v. East Baton Rouge Par. Sch. Bd., 103 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 1997).
Cefalu ex rel. Cefalu v. East Baton Rouge Par. Sch. Bd., 103 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 1997). · cites it 3× “” 34 C.F.R. § 76.653 . Finally, “[t]he program benefits that [an agency] provides for students enrolled in private schools must be comparable in quality, scope, and opportunity for participation to the program benefits that the [agency] provides for students enrolled in public…”
K.R., an Infant, by Her Parents & Next Friends M.R. & K.R.R., & M.R. & K.R.R. v. Anderson Cmty. Sch. Corp., 81 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 1996). “34 C.F.R. § 76.653 . Finally, at least for our purposes, “[t]he program benefits that [an agency] provides for students enrolled in private schools must be comparable in quality, scope, and opportunity for participation to the program benefits that the [agency] provides for…”
Peter v. Johnson, 958 F. Supp. 1383 (D. Minnesota 1997). “34 C.F.R. § 76.653 . The program benefits that are provided for students enrolled in a private school “must be comparable in quality, scope, and opportunity for participation to the program benefits that the subgrantee provides for students enrolled in public schools.”
Natchez-Adams Sch. Dist. v. Searing, 918 F. Supp. 1028 (S.D. Miss. 1996). “” 34 C.F.R. § 76.653 . The EDGAR regulations further require the public school district to spend a different average amount on program benefits for students enrolled in private schools if the average cost of meeting the needs of those students is different from the average cost…”
Foley v. Special Sch. Dist. of St. Louis Cnty., 968 F. Supp. 481 (E.D. Mo. 1997). “34 C.F.R. § 76.653 . In addition, the program benefits that an agency provides for students enrolled in private schools must be comparable in quality, scope and opportunity for participation to the program benefits that the agency provides for students enrolled in public schools.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.