37 C.F.R. § 1.139
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1978–2005 · leading case: Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Wencke, 577 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1978).
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Wencke, 577 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1978). “) An abandoned patent application may become evidence of prior art only when it has been appropriately disclosed, as, for example, when the abandoned patent is referenced in the disclosure of another patent, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure under 37 C.”
Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Commc'ns Grp., Inc., 369 F. Supp. 2d 159 (D. Mass. 2005). ““An abandoned patent application may become evidence of prior art only when it has been appropriately disclosed, as, for example, when the abandoned patent is referenced in the disclosure of another patent, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure under 37 C.F.R. § 1.139 .”…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.