C.F.R. » Title 37 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 1—RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES › Subpart D—Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents

37 C.F.R. § 1.535

Reply by third party requester in ex parte reexamination

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A reply to the patent owner's statement under § 1.530 may be filed by the ex parte reexamination requester within two months from the date of service of the patent owner's statement. Any reply by the ex parte requester must be served upon the patent owner in accordance with § 1.248. If the patent owner does not file a statement under § 1.530, no reply or other submission from the ex parte reexamination requester will be considered.

[65 FR 76776, Dec. 7, 2000]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–2002 · leading case: Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH (2002) dcd · cites it 2× “530 and the reply by the requestor under 37 C.F.R. § 1.535 . M.P.E.P. § 2241. The PTO states that a grant of reexamination need only establish *69 a substantially new question of patentability as to any one of the patent’s claims, even if the request for reexamination does not…”
Syntex (u.s.a.) Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (1989) cafc “§ 304 ; 37 C.F.R. § 1.535 (1988). On April 2, 1987, the PTO issued a notice of its intent to issue a Reexamination Certificate.”
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) txnd · cites it 2× “See 37 C.F.R. § 1.535 . No other submission from the reexamination requester will be considered, id.”
Patlex Corp., Inc. v. Mossinghoff (1983) paed “37 C.F.R. § 1.535 . Upon completing reexamination, the examiner may find all patent claims patentable over prior art.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.