37 C.F.R. § 1.947
Comments by third party requester to patent owner's response in inter partes reexamination
Each time the patent owner files a response to an Office action on the merits pursuant to § 1.945, a third party requester may once file written comments within a period of 30 days from the date of service of the patent owner's response. These comments shall be limited to issues raised by the Office action or the patent owner's response. The time for submitting comments by the third party requester may not be extended. For the purpose of filing the written comments by the third party requester, the comments will be considered as having been received in the Office as of the date of deposit specified in the certificate under § 1.8.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2023 · leading case: Synqor, Inc. v. Vicor Corp., 988 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2021).
Synqor, Inc. v. Vicor Corp., 988 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2021). “” See also 37 C.F.R. § 1.947 (“Each time the patent owner files a response to an Office action on the merits pursuant to § 1.”
Equipements De Trasformation IMAC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., 559 F. Supp. 2d 809 (E.D. Mich. 2008). “§ 314 (b)(2) and 37 C.F.R. § 1.947 ). According to the plaintiff, it has “responded to the .”
Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2023). “45 (citing Apple’s Comments Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.947 , J.A. 6299). That is, the limitation in question—returning an error message upon determining that the client computer is not permitted to resolve addresses of non secure target computers—would be understood to be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.