37 C.F.R. § 303.4

Content of motion and responsive pleadings

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A motion, responsive pleading, or reply must, at a minimum, state concisely the specific relief the party seeks from the Copyright Royalty Judges, and the legal, factual, and evidentiary basis for granting that relief (or denying the relief sought by the moving party). A motion, or a responsive pleading that seeks alternative relief, must be accompanied by a proposed order.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2020–2020 · leading case: George Johnson v. CRB (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020).
George Johnson v. CRB (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020). “at 1918; see 37 C.F.R. § 303.4 (“A motion * * * must, at a minimum, state concisely the specific relief the party seeks from the [Board], and the legal, factual, and evidentiary basis for granting that relief[.”
George Johnson v. CRB (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020). “at 1918; see 37 C.F.R. § 303.4 (“A motion * * * must, at a minimum, state concisely the specific relief the party seeks from the [Board], and the legal, factual, and evidentiary basis for granting that relief[.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.