C.F.R. » Title 38 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS › PART 20—BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS: RULES OF PRACTICE › Subpart J—Action by the Board in Legacy Appeals

38 C.F.R. § 20.901

Rule 901. Submission of additional evidence after initiation of appeal

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Subject to the limitations set forth in Rule 1304 (§ 20.1304 of this part), an appellant may submit additional evidence, or information as to the availability of additional evidence, after initiating an appeal. The provisions of this section do not apply in proceedings before the General Counsel conducted under part 14 of this chapter to cancel accreditation or to review fee agreements and expenses for reasonableness.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5902, 5903, 5904; 38 U.S.C. 5904, 7105(d)(1) (2016)) [57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 73 FR 29879, May 22, 2008. Redesignated and amended at 84 FR 188, 190, Jan. 18, 2019; 84 FR 4337, Feb. 15, 2019]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: Barney O. Padgett v. R. James Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 133 (Vet. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Proceviat v. McDonough (Fed. Cir. 2023). “§ 7109 ; 38 C.F.R. § 20.901 (a), (d); Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.”
Proceviat v. McDonough (Fed. Cir. 2023). “§ 7109 ; 38 C.F.R. § 20.901 (a), (d); Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.”
13-30 792 (Board of Vet. App. 2018). “See 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.901 , 20.903 (2017). Neither the Veteran nor his representative submitted any additional evidence or argument.”
09-04 069 (Board of Vet. App. 2017).
12-12 279 (Board of Vet. App. 2017).
09-47 358 (Board of Vet. App. 2017).
13-22 855 (Board of Vet. App. 2017).
14-27 194 (Board of Vet. App. 2017).
09-49 169 (Board of Vet. App. 2017). “§ 7109 and 38 C.F.R. § 20.901 . The matter is now again before the Board for adjudication.”
10-19 236 (Board of Vet. App. 2016).
13-23 454 (Board of Vet. App. 2016).
10-07 784 (Board of Vet. App. 2016).
Show all 58 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.