4 C.F.R. § 21.12

Distribution of decisions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Unless it contains protected information, a copy of a decision shall be provided to the protester, any intervenors, and the agency involved; a copy also shall be made available to the public. A copy of a decision containing protected information shall be provided only to the agency and to individuals admitted to any protective order issued in the protest. A public version omitting the protected information shall be prepared wherever possible.

(b) Decisions will be distributed to the parties through the EPDS.

[61 FR 39042, July 26, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 79836, Dec. 31, 2002; 73 FR 32430, June 9, 2008; 83 FR 13825, Apr. 2, 2018]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1991–1999 · leading case: Dubinsky v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 243 (Fed. Cl. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dubinsky v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 243 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “See 4 C.F.R. § 21.12 (a). On February 4, this court issued a decision directing Sgt.”

State ex rel. Educ. Assessments Sys., Inc. v. Coop. Educ. Servs. of New Mexico, Inc., 848 P.2d 1123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993). “4 C.F.R. § 21.12 . Further, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.”

Stay, Inc. v. Cheney, 940 F.2d 1457 (11th Cir. 1991). “4 C.F.R. § 21.12 . Stay's action for relief in the district court arises under federal law as prescribed in the jurisdictional statute codified at 28 U.”

State Ex Rel. Eas v. Coop. Educ., 848 P.2d 1123 (N.M. Ct. App. 1993). “4 C.F.R. § 21.12 . Further, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.