40 C.F.R. § 125.1
Purpose and scope
This subpart establishes criteria and standards for the imposition of technology-based treatment requirements in permits under section 301(b) of the Act, including the application of EPA promulgated effluent limitations and case-by-case determinations of effluent limitations under section 402(a)(1) of the Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1974–2023 · leading case: Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023).
Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). “1974); 40 CFR § 125.1 (o) (1974) (initial EPA CWA defni- tion).”
Train v. Colorado Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc., 426 U.S. 1 (1976). “” 40 CFR § 125.1 (y) (1975) (citations omitted).”
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee, 73 F.3d 546 (5th Cir. 1996). “The "Coastal Subcategory" includes facilities engaged in oil and gas production, field exploration, drilling, and well completion and treatment in "any body of water landward of the territorial seas as defined in 40 C.F.R. 125.1(gg), or any wetlands adjacent to such waters.”
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co., 73 F.3d 546 (5th Cir. 1996). “The “Coastal Subcategory” includes facilities engaged in oil and gas production, field exploration, drilling, and well completion and treatment in "any body of water landward of the territorial seas as defined in 40 C.F.R. 125.1(gg), or any wetlands adjacent to such waters.”
United States v. Frezzo Bros., Inc., 546 F. Supp. 713 (E.D. Pa. 1982). “They were represented by competent counsel and have not shown that the failure to raise the 40 C.F.R. § 125.1 , et seq. defense amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel, see p.”
Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). “, Holland, 373 F. Supp., at 672 (“The forego- ing [legislative history] compels the Court to conclude that the former test of navigability was indeed defined away in the [CWA]”).”
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 8 F. Supp. 3d 500 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). “13,528, 13,528-29 (May 22, 1973) (codifying the memorandum’s proposed interpretation at 40 C.F.R. § 125.1 (0)). Approximately two years later, the EPA’s Office of the General Counsel again issued a memorandum — this time in the form of a formal opinion — discussing the scope of…”
Save Our Sound Fisheries Ass'n v. Callaway, 387 F. Supp. 292 (D.R.I. 1974). “§ 1362 (6); 40 C.F.R. § 125.1 (X) (38 Fed.Reg. 13529 ' (1973)).”
Montgomery Env't Coalition v. Costle, 646 F.2d 568 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “40 C.F.R. § 125.1 (hh) (1975), 38 Fed.Reg.”
Colorado Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. Train, 507 F.2d 743 (10th Cir. 1974). “40 C. F.R. § 125.1 (x) (1973) reads in pertinent part as follows: “§ 125.”
Comm. for Consideration of Jones Falls Sewage Sys. v. Train, 539 F.2d 1006 (4th Cir. 1976). “40 C.F.R. § 125.1 (p)(2). . 33 U.S.C. § 407 .”
Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). “1974); 40 CFR § 125.1 (o) (1974) (initial EPA CWA defni- tion).”
— 40 C.F.R. § 125.1(gg) — 2 cases
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee, 73 F.3d 546 (5th Cir. 1996). “The "Coastal Subcategory" includes facilities engaged in oil and gas production, field exploration, drilling, and well completion and treatment in "any body of water landward of the territorial seas as defined in 40 C.F.R. 125.1(gg), or any wetlands adjacent to such waters.”
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co., 73 F.3d 546 (5th Cir. 1996). “The “Coastal Subcategory” includes facilities engaged in oil and gas production, field exploration, drilling, and well completion and treatment in "any body of water landward of the territorial seas as defined in 40 C.F.R. 125.1(gg), or any wetlands adjacent to such waters.”
— 40 C.F.R. § 125.1(x) — 1 case
Colorado Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. Russell Train, 507 F.2d 743 (10th Cir. 1974).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.