40 C.F.R. § 19.2

Effective date

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The statutory civil monetary penalty levels set forth in the third column of Table 1 of § 19.4 apply to all violations which occur or occurred after November 2, 2015, where the penalties are assessed on or after January 8, 2025. The statutory civil monetary penalty levels set forth in the fourth column of table 1 of § 19.4 apply to all violations which occurred after November 2, 2015, where the penalties were assessed on or after December 27, 2023, but before January 8, 2025.

(b) The statutory monetary penalty levels in the third column of table 2 to § 19.4 apply to all violations which occurred after December 6, 2013, through November 2, 2015, and to violations occurring after November 2, 2015, where penalties were assessed before August 1, 2016. The statutory civil monetary penalty levels set forth in the fourth column of table 2 of § 19.4 apply to all violations which occurred after January 12, 2009, through December 6, 2013. The statutory civil monetary penalty levels set forth in the fifth column of table 2 of § 19.4 apply to all violations which occurred after March 15, 2004, through January 12, 2009. The statutory civil monetary penalty levels set forth in the sixth column of table 2 of § 19.4 apply to all violations which occurred after January 30, 1997, through March 15, 2004.

[90 FR 1377, Jan. 8, 2025]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 2000–2017 · leading case: Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n, Inc. Sierra Club, Inc. & Our Child.'s Earth Found. v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 480 F.3d 410 (6th Cir. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n, Inc. Sierra Club, Inc. & Our Child.'s Earth Found. v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 480 F.3d 410 (6th Cir. 2007). “” However, the citizen-suit provision authorizes "any person” to pursue a CAA action, and authorizes the district court “to apply any appropriate civil penalties.” 42 U.S.C. § 7604 (a). The EPA raised the penalties to $27,500 per day for violations committed between January 30,…”

Emhart Indus., Inc. v. New England Container Co., 274 F. Supp. 3d 30 (D.R.I. 2017). “40 C.F.R. §§ 19.2 , 19.4. III. Scope of Review Having described the remedy-selection process as outlined by CERCLA and the NCP, the Court will now provide its findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding EPA’s remedy-selection process at the Site.”

United States v. Alisal Water Corp., 114 F. Supp. 2d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2000). “40 C.F.R. §§ 19.2 , 19.4. 8 . There is no dispute that the corporate defendants rather than the Adcocks are the "owners” of the public water systems.”

United States Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp. v. Atl. Salmon of Maine, LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 407 (D. Me. 2003). “§ 1319 (d), and $27,500 per day for violations occurring after January 31, 1997, see 40 C.F.R. §§ 19.2 , 19.4. Assessing only a single violation each day since October 22, 1990, each Defendant stands exposed to a damages award in excess of $9,500,000.”

Natl Parks v. TVA (6th Cir. 2007). “40 C.F.R. §§ 19.2 , 19.4. No. 05-6329 Nat’l Parks Conservation Assoc.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.