40 C.F.R. § 264.37

Arrangements with local authorities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The owner or operator must attempt to make the following arrangements, as appropriate for the type of waste handled at his facility and the potential need for the services of these organizations:

(1) Arrangements to familiarize police, fire departments, and emergency response teams with the layout of the facility, properties of hazardous waste handled at the facility and associated hazards, places where facility personnel would normally be working, entrances to and roads inside the facility, and possible evacuation routes;

(2) Where more than one police and fire department might respond to an emergency, agreements designating primary emergency authority to a specific police and a specific fire department, and agreements with any others to provide support to the primary emergency authority;

(3) Agreements with State emergency response teams, emergency response contractors, and equipment suppliers; and

(4) Arrangements to familiarize local hospitals with the properties of hazardous waste handled at the facility and the types of injuries or illnesses which could result from fires, explosions, or releases at the facility.

(b) Where State or local authorities decline to enter into such arrangements, the owner or operator must document the refusal in the operating record.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1991 · leading case: Bd. of Nat. Resources v. Walker Cnty., 407 S.E.2d 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).
Bd. of Nat. Resources v. Walker Cnty., 407 S.E.2d 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 5× “Appellants contend that the superior court erroneously applied, or ignored, the standards for review of administrative decisions found in OCGA § 50-13-19 when it rejected the ALJ’s conclusion that the permit met the requirements of 40 CFR § 264.37 (a) (l)-(4). The superior court…”
Opinion No. (1983) (Mo. Att'y Gen. 1983). “Second, 40 CFR 264.37 (a) requires the permittee to familiarize local hospitals with the properties of the wastes handled at the facility and health effects which could result from fires, explosions and other releases of wastes at the facility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.