40 C.F.R. § 35.2105
Debarment and suspension
The applicant shall indicate whether it used the services of any individual, organization, or unit of government for facilities planning or design work whose name appears on the master list of debarments, suspensions, and voluntary exclusions. See 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR part 1532. If the applicant indicates it has used the services of a debarred individual or firm, EPA will closely examine the facilities plan, design drawings and specifications to determine whether to award a grant. EPA will also determine whether the applicant should be found non-responsible under 2 CFR parts 200 and 1500 or be the subject of possible debarment or suspension under 2 CFR part 1532.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1984–1984 · leading case: Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus, 579 F. Supp. 15 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus, 579 F. Supp. 15 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “Plaintiff next charges that the defendants have not met the requirement of 40 C.F.R. § 35.2105 that an applicant indicate if any facilities planning or design on the project was done by anyone whose name appears on a master list of debarments.”
Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus, 740 F.2d 185 (2d Cir. 1984). “” As for Orange-town’s charge that appellees have not satisfied the requirement of 40 C.F.R. § 35.2105 that the applicant indicate whether any facilities planning or design was performed by anyone appearing on a master list of debarments, the checklist notes that the applicant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.