40 C.F.R. § 35.2114

Value engineering

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If the project has not received Step 2 grant assistance the applicant shall conduct value engineering if the total estimated cost of building the treatment works is more than $10 million.

(b) The value engineering recommendations shall be implemented to the maximum extent feasible.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2040-0027)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1984 · leading case: Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus, 579 F. Supp. 15 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus, 579 F. Supp. 15 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “Plaintiff asserts that the requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 35.2114 that an applicant conduct value engineering — a cost review process — was not the subject of a proper determination.”

Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus, 740 F.2d 185 (2d Cir. 1984). “In addition, the value engineering required by 40 C.F.R. § 35.2114 was conducted, as is shown by the State’s subsequent written approval.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.