40 C.F.R. § 81.414

Michigan

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Area nameAcreagePublic Law establishingFederal land manager
Isle Royale NP542,42871-835USDI-NPS
Seney Wild25,15091-504USDI-FWS
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2014 · leading case: Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 759 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2014).
Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 759 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2014). “See 40 C.F.R. §§ 81.414 , .415. In 2009, the DOI certified that existing visual impairments at the two parks were reasonably attributable to pollution emissions from NSP’s Sherco facility.”
Michigan v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 581 F.3d 524 (7th Cir. 2009). “415 , and the Seney Wilderness Area in Michigan’s own Upper Peninsula, 40 C.F.R. § 81.414 , the issues it raises are often hashed out in the context of the application process for a particular permit and frequently involve a series of cooperative arrangements.”
State of Michigan v. Env't Prot. Agenc (7th Cir. 2009). “415 , and the Seney Wilderness Area in Michigan’s own Upper Peninsula, 40 C.F.R. § 81.414 , the issues it raises are often hashed out in the context of the application process for a particular permit and frequently involve a series of cooperative arrangements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.