(a) In accordance with 40 U.S.C. 589, Federal agencies must comply with the real property policies governing the installation, repair and replacement of sidewalks around buildings, installations, properties, or grounds under the control of executive agencies and owned by the United States. The Federal Government must fund the cost of installing, repairing, and replacing sidewalks. Funds appropriated to the agency for installation, repair, and maintenance, generally, must be available for expenditure to accomplish the purposes of this subpart. Upon approval from GSA, Federal agencies may—
(1) Authorize the appropriate State or local government to install, repair and replace sidewalks, or arrange for this work, and reimburse them for this work; or
(2) Contract or otherwise arrange and pay directly for installing, repairing and/or replacing sidewalks.
(b) Federal agencies, giving due consideration to State and local standards and specifications for sidewalks, decide when to install, repair or replace a sidewalk. However, Federal agencies may prescribe other standards and specifications for sidewalks whenever necessary to achieve architectural harmony and maintain facility security.
Notes of Decisions
Resource Conservation Grp., LLC v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 457 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
· cites it 5× “Although RCG concedes that “timber, embedded gravel, sand, or stone” are recognized as “real property” under 41 C.F.R. § 102-71.20 , “real property” is also defined as “any interest in land, together with the improvements, structures, and fixtures[.”
Bilfinger Berger AG Sede Secondaria Italiana v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 96 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
“The Navy apprised RCG that its proposal did not fall within the scope of the solicitation because the disposal of sand and gravel, which were construed as real property pursuant to 41 C.F.R. § 102-71.20 , was prohibit ed. Id.”
Terry v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 131 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
“The Navy apprised RCG that its proposal did not fall within the scope of the solicitation because the disposal of sand and gravel, which were construed as real property pursuant to 41 C.F.R. § 102-71.20 , was prohibited. Id.”
Cully Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022).
· cites it 3× “” 41 C.F.R. § 102-71.20 . This is in contrast with the subchapter related to donating personal property, which defines a “public body” as “any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or local government; any Indian tribe; or any agency…”
Cully Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022).
· cites it 2× “” 41 C.F.R. § 102-71.20 . This is in contrast with the subchapter related to donating personal property, which defines a “public body” as “any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or local government; any Indian tribe; or any agency…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.