41 C.F.R. § 60-1.1

Purpose and application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to achieve the aims of parts II, III, and IV of Executive Order 11246 for the promotion and insuring of equal opportunity for all persons, without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin, employed or seeking employment with Government contractors or with contractors performing under federally assisted construction contracts. The regulations in this part apply to all contracting agencies of the Government and to contractors and subcontractors who perform under Government contracts, to the extent set forth in this part. The regulations in this part also apply to all agencies of the Government administering programs involving Federal financial assistance which may include a construction contract, and to all contractors and subcontractors performing under construction contracts which are related to any such programs. The procedures set forth in the regulations in this part govern all disputes relative to a contractor's compliance with his obligations under the equal opportunity clause regardless of whether or not his contract contains a “Disputes” clause. Failure of a contractor or applicant to comply with any provision of the regulations in this part shall be grounds for the imposition of any or all of the sanctions authorized by the order. The regulations in this part do not apply to any action taken to effect compliance with respect to employment practices subject to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The rights and remedies of the Government hereunder are not exclusive and do not affect rights and remedies provided elsewhere by law, regulation, or contract; neither do the regulations limit the exercise by the Secretary or Government agencies of powers not herein specifically set forth, but granted to them by the order.

[79 FR 72993, Dec. 9, 2014]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 27 cases, 1971–2017 · leading case: Joel T. Howard v. Uniroyal, Inc., 719 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Joel T. Howard v. Uniroyal, Inc., 719 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “At oral argument, plaintiff apparently contends that 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.1 (1983) 9 expresses a clear intent to preserve state contract actions: “The rights and remedies of the Government hereunder are not exclusive and do not affect rights and remedies provided elsewhere by law,…”

13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 868, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,208 Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Co. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., Concerned Workers, Intervenor-Defendants. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Co. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Co. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., Concerned Workers, Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Co. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., Concerned Workers, Intervenors-Appellants. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & Its Subsidiary, Fraser & Johnston Co. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., Concerned Workers, Defendant-Intervenors. United States Steel Corp. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., United States Steel Corp. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., Gen. Motors Corp. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., Gen. Motors Corp. v. James R. Schlesinger, Sec'y, U. S. Dep't of Def., 542 F.2d 1190 (4th Cir. 1976). “2000e-8(e), as well as 41 C.F.R. 60-1.1, et seq. of the Department of Labor's own regulations.”

Barbara J. Eatmon v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc., Barbara J. Eatmon, Cross-Appellees v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc., Cross-Appellant. Barbara J. Eatmon v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc., 769 F.2d 1503 (11th Cir. 1985). “205-212; 41 C.F.R. 60-1.1 to 1.34. Responsibility for administration of the order is on the Secretary of Labor.”

O'Connor v. Chrysler Corp., 86 F.R.D. 211 (D. Mass. 1980). “41 CFR § 60-1.1 (1979). In essence, the regulations, specifically 41 CFR § 60-1.”

Morris v. Amalgamated Lithographers of Am., 994 F. Supp. 161 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). “” 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.1 . It requires such employers to develop affirmative -action programs.”

Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 412 F. Supp. 171 (D. Del. 1976). “The Secretary of Labor has promulgated regulations pursuant to section 201 of the Executive Order which are found at 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.1 et seq. *173 Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder require government contractors to submit equal…”

Carroll v. Off. of Fed. Contract Compliance Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 235 F. Supp. 3d 79 (D.D.C. 2017). “” 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.1 . Carroll believes that the phrase “shall be grounds” obligates OFCCP to issue a show cause notice in response to the EEOC Determination.”

Tangren v. Wackenhut Servs., Inc., 480 F. Supp. 539 (D. Nev. 1979). “Finally, WSI had an obligation to work toward a minority representation among its employees that approximated the minority percentage in the local labor force.”

Lewis v. W. Airlines, Inc., 379 F. Supp. 684 (N.D. Cal. 1974). · cites it 3× “169 (1974), and the Regulations appear at 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.1 et seq. (1973). Executive Order 11246 seeks to ensure that employers holding government contracts hire their employees without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin.”

United Tech. Corp. v. Marshall, 464 F. Supp. 845 (D. Conn. 1979). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.1 et seq. 3 . However, one member of that panel, when sitting by designation in the D.”

Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. Friedman, 451 F. Supp. 736 (D. Maryland 1978). “See 41 C.F.R. 60-1.1 et seq. In 1969, in response to general complaints made by several religious-oriented community organizations, including the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League, the Secretary of Labor initiated a pilot project regarding religious…”

Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Schlesinger, 392 F. Supp. 1246 (E.D. Va. 1974). “” 41 CFR § 60-1.1 . Thé Hill House Association (Hill), on October 17, 1973, requested the release of the latest EEO-1 form filed by the Westinghouse facility.”

Show all 27 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.